Cited by 21Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPlant and animal studies

Introduced European rabbit as main prey of the native carnivore culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) in disturbed ecosystems of central Chile

Open access
Rubio, André V., Alvarado, Romina, Bonacic, Cristian·2013·Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment

Abstract

This study describes food habits of the culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) by scat analysis in two hills considered Priority Conservation Sites of the Mediterranean Region of central Chile, one of the most disturbed and modified ecosystems in the country. The results showed that foxes from both sites consume the introduced European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as primary prey and native small mammals as secondary prey. This is the first record of feeding habits of the culpeo fox in central Chile that reports a higher consumption of European rabbit over pooled native small mammals. The reason for this result, as well as the higher trophic niche breadth and trophic niche diversity found in culpeo fox populations from the less disturbed hill, might be due to anthropogenic impacts on the study sites. However, to validate this claim, further studies on prey availability and human impact are required. The culpeo fox can have an important role in controlling pests such as the European rabbit; therefore, a more extensive study of this issue can bring important information for the conservation and management of natural areas of central Chile that show high human impact.Este estudio describe los hábitos alimentarios del zorro culpeo (Lycalopex culpaeus) en dos cerros considerados “Sitios Prioritarios de Conservación” de la eco-región mediterránea de Chile central, el cual es una de las zonas más intervenidas y modificadas del país. Los resultados encontrados muestran que los zorros de a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01650521.2013.831521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubio, A. V., Alvarado, R., & Bonacic, C.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Rubio, André V.
Venue
Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment
Published
2013-08
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
89-94
ISSN
  • 0165-0521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5140
OpenAlex
W2021744234
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
culpeo fox, Lycalopex culpaeus, rabbits, carnivore diet, scat analysis, trophic niche breadth, human disturbance, pest control, hills, central Chile, Mediterranean, conservation sites, predator-prey interactions, invasive species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review