Cited by 0Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

A review of: “Child neuropsychology: Clinical practice”

Reed, James C.·1988·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

Abstract John E. Obrzut & George W. Hynd (Eds.) Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 2: Clinical Practice Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986. pp. vii + 325, ISBN 0-12-524042-2 $41.50 hardcover; $24.95 paperback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01688638808402817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Reed, J. C.
Corresponding author
Reed, James C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
1988-12
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
818-820
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0168-8634
OpenAlex
W2076656374
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
child neuropsychology, clinical practice, pediatric neuropsychological assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review