The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech
Abstract
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 13 scalp electrodes while subjects listened to sentences containing syntactic ambiguities. Words that were inconsistent with the “preferred” sentence structure elicited a positive-going wave (the P600 effect), similar to that elicited by such words during reading (Osterhout & Holcomb, 1992). These results suggest that (1) ERPs recorded during the comprehension of spoken sentences are sensitive to the syntactic anomaly engendered by disambiguating material following erroneous analysis of a syntactically ambiguous string (the “garden-path” effect), (2) the parsing strategies employed during sentence comprehension are (in some circumstances) constant across modalities, and (3) syntactic analysis of spoken sentences is temporally close to the acoustic input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Cited by
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
Friederici, A. D. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01839-8 · Cited by 2,231
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
Self-citationBrouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055 · Cited by 625
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007 · Cited by 594
The linguistic processes underlying the P600
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960902965951 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-11-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-437
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2071119661
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690969308407584
- The paper
- Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
