The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing
Abstract
A description is given of the main experiments that have been taken as support for the view that, in reading, a prefixed word is stripped of its prefix and lexically accessed on the basis of its stem. Since one of the most important of those experiments had been poorly executed, a new version of the same study is presented with results that are entirely consistent with the previous one. However, logical problems exist with the view that says that stems act as access codes used to gain access to the lexicon, the main ones having to do with the fact that a prefix store is required. As a result, an alternative model is favoured, namely, an interactive-activation model. Prefixed words are represented in decomposed form in this model, but no prelexical prefix-stripping is required. A detailed examination is made of the manner in which this framework is able to incorporate the previous empirical results, as well as other aspects of morphological processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS)
Taft, M. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90544-9 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Cited by
Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618772271 · Cited by 1,297
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0023851 · Cited by 595
The Acquisition of Morphophonology
MacWhinney, B. (1978) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166047 · Cited by 502
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · Cited by 384
Derivative Word Forms: What Do Learners Know?
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588328 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Taft, M.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-294
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2028650605
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690969408402120
- The paper
- Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.