Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017

Hentout, Abdelfetah, Aouache, Mustapha, Maoudj, Abderraouf, Akli, Isma·2019·Advanced Robotics
DOI 10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Currently, a large number of industrial robots have been deployed to replace or assist humans to perform various repetitive and dangerous manufacturing tasks. However, based on current technological capabilities, such robotics field is rapidly evolving so that humans are not only sharing the same workspace with robots, but also are using robots as useful assistants. Consequently, due to this new type of emerging robotic systems, industrial collaborative robots or cobots, human and robot co-workers have been able to work side-by-side as collaborators to accomplish tasks in industrial environments. Therefore, new human–robot interaction systems have been developed for such systems to be able to utilize the capabilities of both humans and robots. Accordingly, this article presents a literature review of major recent works on human–robot interactions in industrial collaborative robots, conducted during the last decade (between 2008 and 2017). Additionally, the article proposes a tentative classification of the content of these works into several categories and sub-categories. Finally, this paper addresses some challenges of industrial collaborative robotics and explores future research issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Research works printed but not linked: 116

  1. Angerer A, 2013, J Softw Eng Robot, 4, 1
  2. Hvilshøj M, Bøgh S, Madsen O, et al. The mobile robot ‘little helper’: concepts, ideas and working principles. 2009 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation. ETFA 2009. IEEE; 2009. p. 1–4. · doi:10.1109/etfa.2009.5347251
  3. Akli I, Bouzouia B. Time-dependent trajectory generation for tele-operated mobile manipulator. 2015 3rd International Conference on Control, Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT). IEEE; 2015. p. 1–5.
  4. Bortot DF. Ergonomic human-robot coexistence in the branch of production [PhD thesis]. Technische Universität München; 2014.
  5. Vaughan B, 2012, Acta Polytech Hung, 9, 7
  6. Stadler S, Weiss A, Mirnig N, et al. Anthropomorphism in the factory: a paradigm change? Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. IEEE Press; 2013. p. 231–232. · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483586
  7. Solvang B, Sziebig G. On industrial robots and cognitive info-communication. 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). IEEE; 2012. p. 459–464. · doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2012.6422025
  8. Dániel B, 2014, Acta Polytech Hung, 11, 135
  9. Wang N, Zeng Y, Geng J. A brief review on safety strategies of physical human-robot interaction. ITM Web of Conferences. Vol. 25. EDP Sciences; 2019. p. 01015. · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20192501015
  10. Cherubini A, Passama R, Meline A, et al. Multimodal control for human-robot cooperation. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2013. p. 2202–2207. · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696664
  11. Fujii M, 2016, IHI Eng Rev, 49, 24
  12. Soratana T, Balakuntala MV, Abbaraju P, et al. Glovebox handling of high-consequence materials with super baxter and gesture-based programming – 18598. Waste Management (WM 2018), 44th International Symposium on; Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2018. p. 1–14.
  13. Ge JG. Programming by demonstration by optical tracking system for dual arm robot. IEEE ISR 2013. IEEE; 2013. p. 1–7.
  14. Klotzbücher M, 2012, J Softw Eng Robot, 3, 28
  15. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.045 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.045
  16. Geravand M, Flacco F, De Luca A. Human-robot physical interaction and collaboration using an industrial robot with a closed control architecture. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2013. p. 4000–4007. · doi:10.1109/icra.2013.6631141
  17. Haddadin S, Albu-Schaffer A, Frommberger M, et al. The ‘DLR crash report’: towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety – part II: discussions. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. ICRA'09. IEEE; 2009. p. 280–287. · doi:10.1109/robot.2009.5152711
  18. Dimoulas KN. Human robot collaboration (HRC) for assembly operations using industrial robots [PhD thesis]. University of Patras, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and Automation (LMS); 2017.
  19. Shravani NK, 2018, Int J Eng Technol Sci Res, 5, 1128
  20. Moulières-Seban T, 2018, Ingénierie Cognit, 1, 1
  21. Moulières-Seban T, Salotti JM, Claverie B, et al. Classification of cobotic systems for industrial applications. The 6th Workshop Towards a Framework for Joint Action; 2015 Oct. p. 1–6.
  22. Tolós Pons N. Standarization in human robot interaction [PhD thesis]. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; 2013.
  23. Meziane R, Li P, Otis MJD, et al. Safer hybrid workspace using human-robot interaction while sharing production activities. 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) Proceedings. IEEE; 2014. · doi:10.1109/rose.2014.6952980
  24. Bo H, Mohan DM, Azhar M, et al. Human-robot collaboration for tooling path guidance. 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). IEEE; 2016. p. 1340–1345.
  25. Gambao E, Hernando M, Surdilovic D. A new generation of collaborative robots for material handling. ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Vol. 29. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Economics & Property; 2012. p. 1. · doi:10.4017/gt.2012.11.02.362.776
  26. Bernhardt R, Surdilovic D, Katschinski V, et al. Next generation of flexible assembly systems. In: Azevedo A, editor. Innovation in manufacturing networks. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2008. p. 279–288. · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09492-2_30
  27. Unland R. Chapter 2 – Industrial agents. In: Leitão P, Karnouskos S, editor. Industrial agents. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann; 2015. p. 23–44. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800341-1.00002-4
  28. Leitão P, Inden U, Rückemann CP. Parallelising multi-agent systems for high performance computing. Third International Conference on Advanced Communications and Computation (INFOCOMP13). Vol. 6. IARIA; 2013. p. 1.
  29. 10.1109/LRA.2016.2535859 · doi:10.1109/lra.2016.2535859
  30. Vick A, 2015, RoMoCo, 15, 33
  31. 10.1109/TASE.2015.2408264 · doi:10.1109/tase.2015.2408264
  32. De Benedictis C, Franco W, Maffiodo D, et al. Control of force impulse in human-machine impact. International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region. Springer; 2017. p. 956–964. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_102
  33. Gaz C, Flacco F, De Luca A. Identifying the dynamic model used by the KUKA LWR: a reverse engineering approach. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2014. p. 1386–1392. · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907033
  34. Navarro B, Cherubini A, Fonte A, et al. An iso10218-compliant adaptive damping controller for safe physical human-robot interaction. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2016. p. 3043–3048. · doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487468
  35. Waurzyniak P., 2015, Manuf Eng, 154, 55
  36. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.199 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.199
  37. Courreges F, Laribi MA, Arsicault M, et al. Designing a biomimetic model of non-linear elastic safety mechanism for collaborative robots. 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE; 2016. p. 231–236. · doi:10.1109/indin.2016.7819164
  38. She Y, Su HJ, Hurd CJ. Shape optimization of 2D compliant links for design of inherently safe robots. ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2015. p. V05BT08A004–V05BT08A004.
  39. Meng D, 2017, J Mech Robot, 2017, 1
  40. Wolf S, Hirzinger G. A new variable stiffness design: matching requirements of the next robot generation. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. ICRA 2008. IEEE; 2008. p. 1741–1746. · doi:10.1109/robot.2008.4543452
  41. Groothuis S, Carloni R, Stramigioli S. A novel variable stiffness mechanism capable of an infinite stiffness range and unlimited decoupled output motion. Actuators. Vol. 3. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2014. p. 107–123. · doi:10.3390/act3020107
  42. Ayoubi Y, Laribi MA, Courrèges F, et al. A complete methodology to design a safety mechanism for prismatic joint implementation. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2016. p. 304–309. · doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759071
  43. Fenucci A, Indri M, Romanelli F. A real time distributed approach to collision avoidance for industrial manipulators. 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE; 2014. p. 1–8. · doi:10.1109/etfa.2014.7005160
  44. Najmaei N, Kermani MR. Prediction-based reactive control strategy for human-robot interactions. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 2010. p. 3434–3439. · doi:10.1109/robot.2010.5509179
  45. Antonelli G, Chiaverini S, Perna V, et al. A modular and task-oriented architecture for open control system: the evolution of c5g open towards high level programming. IEEE 2010 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Workshop on Innovative Robot Control Architectures for Demanding (Research) Applications, Anchorage, Alaska. 2010.
  46. Indri M, Trapani S, Lazzero I. A general procedure for collision detection between an industrial robot and the environment. 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE; 2015. p. 1–8. · doi:10.1109/etfa.2015.7301539
  47. 10.1007/s00170-011-3718-3 · doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3718-3
  48. Mantegazza P. Diapm RTAI for linux: whys, whats and hows. Real-Time Linux Workshop, Conference; 1999 Dec.
  49. Balkan T, Ozgoren MK, Arikan MS. Structure based classification and kinematic analysis of six-joint industrial robotic manipulators. In: Cubero S, editor. Industrial robotics: theory, modelling and control, InTech Europe, Croatia. Mammendorf, Germany: Pro Literatur Verlag/Linz, Austria: ARS; 2006. · doi:10.5772/5009
  50. Ibari B, Bouzgou K, Ahmed-Foitih Z, et al. An application of augmented reality (AR) in the manipulation of fanuc 200ic robot. 2015 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH). IEEE; 2015. p. 56–60. · doi:10.1109/intech.2015.7173366
  51. Ogorodnikova O., 2009, Acta Polytech Hung, 6, 51
  52. Vladareanu V, 2015, Stud Inf Control, 24, 409
  53. Hentout A, Hamdania A, Kachouane H, et al. Multi-agent control architecture for RFID cyber-physical robotic systems: initial validation of tagged objects detection and identification using player/stage. 2016 Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS). IEEE; 2016. p. 1–6. · doi:10.1109/giis.2016.7814851
  54. Korthals T, Krause T, Rückert U. Evidence grid based information fusion for semantic classifiers in dynamic sensor networks. In: Niggemann O, Beyerer J, Machine learning for cyber physical systems. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 9–14. · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48838-6_2
  55. Perez JB, Arrieta AG, Hernández Encinas A, et al. Industrial cyber-physical systems in textile engineering. International Joint Conference SOCO'16-CISIS'16-ICEUTE'16. Springer; 2016. p. 126–135. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47364-2_13
  56. Vogel C, Fritzsche M, Elkmann N. Safe human-robot cooperation with high-payload robots in industrial applications. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE; 2016. p. 529–530. · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451840
  57. 10.1108/IR-10-2015-0195 · doi:10.1108/ir-10-2015-0195
  58. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.030 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.030
  59. Cherubini A. Multimodal sensor-based control for human-robot interaction [PhD thesis]. Université de Montpellier; 2016.
  60. Ragaglia M, Zanchettin AM, Rocco P. Safety-aware trajectory scaling for human-robot collaboration with prediction of human occupancy. 2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). IEEE; 2015. p. 85–90. · doi:10.1109/icar.2015.7251438
  61. Marvel JA. Sensors for safe, collaborative robots in smart manufacturing. 2017 IEEE Sensors. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–3. · doi:10.1109/icsens.2017.8234264
  62. 10.1017/S0263574711001020 · doi:10.1017/s0263574711001020
  63. Polverini MP, Zanchettin AM, Rocco P. Real-time collision avoidance in human-robot interaction based on kinetostatic safety field. 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2014. p. 4136–4141.
  64. Lacevic B. Safe motion planning and control for robotic manipulators-a kinematic approach [PhD thesis, PhD dissertation]. Dipto. Elettron. Inform. e Bioing., Politecnico di; 2011. · doi:10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.00764
  65. 10.1007/s12369-010-0051-1 · doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0051-1
  66. Coupeté E, Moutarde F, Manitsaris S. A user-adaptive gesture recognition system applied to human-robot collaboration in factories. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing. ACM; 2016. p. 12. · doi:10.1145/2948910.2948933
  67. Ramirez-Amaro K, Dean-Leon E, Cheng G. Robust semantic representations for inferring human co-manipulation activities even with different demonstration styles. 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). IEEE; 2015. p. 1141–1146. · doi:10.1109/humanoids.2015.7363496
  68. Hernoux F, Béarée R, Gibaru O. Investigation of dynamic 3D hand motion reproduction by a robot using a leap motion. Proceedings of the 2015 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM; 2015. p. 24. · doi:10.1145/2806173.2806196
  69. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.099 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.099
  70. Niculescu AI, Banchs RE, Li H. Why industrial robots should become more social. International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer; 2014. p. 276–278. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_28
  71. Stenmark M, Nugues P. Natural language programming of industrial robots. 2013 44th International Symposium on Robotics (ISR). IEEE; 2013. p. 1–5. · doi:10.1109/isr.2013.6695630
  72. 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2299559 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2014.2299559
  73. Steinmetz F, Weitschat R. Skill parametrization approaches and skill architecture for human-robot interaction. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE; 2016. p. 280–285. · doi:10.1109/coase.2016.7743419
  74. Hein B, Hensel M, Worn H. Intuitive and model-based on-line programming of industrial robots: a modular on-line programming environment. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. ICRA 2008. IEEE; 2008. p. 3952–3957. · doi:10.1109/robot.2008.4543818
  75. Tykal M, Montebelli A, Kyrki V. Incrementally assisted kinesthetic teaching for programming by demonstration. The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press; 2016. p. 205–212. · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451753
  76. 10.1515/aucts-2017-0018 · doi:10.1515/aucts-2017-0018
  77. Balakirsky S, Kootbally Z, Schlenoff C, et al. An industrial robotic knowledge representation for kit building applications. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2012. p. 1365–1370. · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385871
  78. Roveda L. Model based compliance shaping control of light-weight manipulator in hard-contact industrial applications [PhD thesis]. Italy: 2015.
  79. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.222 · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.222
  80. Mocan B, Fulea M, Brad S. Designing a multimodal human-robot interaction interface for an industrial robot. In: Borangiu T, editor. Advances in robot design and intelligent control. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 255–263. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21290-6_26
  81. 10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z · doi:10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z
  82. Gombolay MC, Shah JA. Challenges in collaborative scheduling of human-robot teams. Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction: Papers From the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium. Google Scholar; 2014.
  83. Tan JTC, Duan F, Zhang Y, et al. Task decomposition of cell production assembly operation for man-machine collaboration by HTA. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics. IEEE; 2008. p. 1066–1071. · doi:10.1109/ical.2008.4636309
  84. Akan B, AAmeri E, Çürüklü B. Augmented reality-based industrial robot control. Proceedings of SIGRAD 2011. Evaluations of Graphics and Visualization Efficiency; Usefulness; Accessibility; Usability; 2011 Nov 17–18; KTH; Stockholm; Sweden. Linköping University Electronic Press; 2011. p. 113–114; 065.
  85. Mourtzis D, Doukas M. A web-based virtual and augmented reality platform for supporting the design of personalised products. CMS (2012), 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Athens, Greece; 2012. p. 234–241.
  86. 10.1007/s12008-009-0066-8 · doi:10.1007/s12008-009-0066-8
  87. Huber M, Knoll A, Brandt T, et al. When to assist? Modelling human behaviour for hybrid assembly systems. 2010 41st International Symposium on Robotics (ISR) and 2010 6th German Conference on Robotics (Robotik). VDE; 2010. p. 1–6.
  88. Charalambous G, Fletcher S, Webb P. Human-automation collaboration in manufacturing. Contemporary ergonomics and human factors 2013. Vol. 59. Routledge in association with GSE Research; 2013. p. 59–66.
  89. Yagoda R. You want me to use that robot? Identifying underlying factors affecting robot use [PhD thesis]. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; 2013.
  90. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.03.002 · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.03.002
  91. Kalisch M. Supervised context classification methods for an industrial machinery. 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE; 2015. p. 1667–1672. · doi:10.15439/2015f292
  92. 10.1108/13552510210439784 · doi:10.1108/13552510210439784
  93. 10.3182/20090630-4-ES-2003.00250 · doi:10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00250
  94. Hoffmann A, Angerer A, Ortmeier F, et al. Hiding real-time: a new approach for the software development of industrial robots. IROS; 2009. p. 2108–2113. · doi:10.1109/iros.2009.5354589
  95. Surdilovic D, Yakut Y, Nguyen TM, et al. Compliance control with dual-arm humanoid robots: design, planning and programming. 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE; 2010. p. 275–281. · doi:10.1109/ichr.2010.5686273
  96. Lamy X. Conception d'une interface de pilotage d'un cobot [PhD thesis]. France: 2011.
  97. Sghaier A, Charpentier P. La problématique de l'utilisation des robots industriels en matière de sécurité. Annales des Mines-Réalités industrielles. 1. Eska; 2012. p. 24–31. · doi:10.3917/rindu.121.0024
  98. Stenmark M, Malec J. A helping hand: industrial robotics, knowledge and user-oriented services. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; Tokyo, Japan. 2013. p. 3–7.
  99. 10.4173/mic.2013.4.4 · doi:10.4173/mic.2013.4.4
  100. Hentout A, Benbouali M, Akli I, et al. A telerobotic human/robot interface for mobile manipulators: a study of human operator performance. 2013 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT). IEEE; 2013. p. 641–646. · doi:10.1109/codit.2013.6689618
  101. Garber L., 2013, Computer, 12, 16
  102. Dobra A. General classification of robots. size criteria. 2014 23rd International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD). IEEE; 2014. p. 1–6. · doi:10.1109/raad.2014.7002249
  103. Thompson JL. Redesigning the human-robot interface: intuitive teleoperation of anthropomorphic robots [PhD thesis]. 2014.
  104. Masinga P, Campbell H, Trimble J. A framework for human collaborative robots, operations in South African automotive industry. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE; 2015. p. 1494–1497. · doi:10.1109/ieem.2015.7385896
  105. Maurice P. Virtual ergonomics for the design of collaborative robots [PhD thesis]. Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI; 2015.
  106. Sbanca MP, Mogan GL. Cooperative assembly using two industrial robots. In: Borangiu T, editor. Advances in robot design and intelligent control. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 47–57. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21290-6_5
  107. Tang G. The development of a human-robot interface for industrial collaborative system [PhD thesis]. School of Engineering, Cranfield University; 2016.
  108. Bauer W, 2016, Lightweight robots in manual assembly-best to start simply
  109. Hentout A, Maoudj A, Bouzouia B. A survey of development frameworks for robotics. 2016 8th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC). IEEE; 2016. p. 67–72. · doi:10.1109/icmic.2016.7804217
  110. Correai Marques JM. A point-and-command interface for grasping unknown objects with robotic manipulators [PhD thesis]. Italy: 2017.
  111. Martinez C, Barrero N, Hernandez W, et al. Setup of the yaskawa sda10f robot for industrial applications, using ros-industrial. Advances in automation and robotics research in Latin America. Springer; 2017. p. 186–203. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54377-2_16
  112. 10.1108/IR-09-2017-0165 · doi:10.1108/ir-09-2017-0165
  113. Salisbury JK. Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates. 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes. IEEE; 1980. p. 95–100. · doi:10.1109/cdc.1980.272026
  114. Chen JH, Song KT. Collision-free motion planning for human-robot collaborative safety under cartesian constraint. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2018. p. 1–7. · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460185
  115. Djezairi S, Akli I, Zamoum-Boushaki R, et al. Mission allocation and execution for human and robot agents in industrial environment. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man). IEEE; 2018. p. 796–801. · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525726
  116. Hentout A, Aouache M, Maoudj A, et al. Key challenges and open issues of industrial collaborative robotics. 2018 The 27th IEEE International Symposium on Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction: from Service to Industry (HRI-SI2018) at Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Proceedings. IEEE; 2018.

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Hentout, A., Aouache, M., Maoudj, A., & Akli, I.
Venue
Advanced Robotics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-07-04
Volume
33
Issue
15-16
Pages
764-799
ISSN
  • 0169-1864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5535
DOI
10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
OpenAlex
W2955189310
Cited by
462
References
194
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
The paper
Hentout, A., Aouache, M., Maoudj, A., & Akli, I. (2019). Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017. Advanced Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.