Improved spinal cord gray matter morphology induced by Spirulina platensis following spinal cord injury in rat models
Abstract
Despite intense preclinical research focusing on developing potential strategies of mitigating spinal cord injury (SCI), SCI still results in permanent, debilitating symptoms for which there are currently no effective pharmacological interventions to improve the recovery of the fine ultrastructure of the spinal cord. Spirulina platensis is thought to have potential neuroprotective effects. We have previously demonstrated its protective potential on the lesioned corticospinal tracts and behavioral recovery. In this study, spirulina, known for its neuroprotective properties was used to further explore its protective effects on spinal cord gray matter ultrastructural. Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were used and divided into sham group (laminectomy without SCI), control group (SCI without S. platensis), and S. platensis group (SCI + 180 mg/kg S. platensis). All animals were anesthetized via intramuscular injection. A partial crush injury was induced at the level of T12. The rats were humanely sacrificed for 28 days postinjury for ultrastructural study. There were significant mean differences with respect to pairwise comparisons between the ultrastructural grading score of neuronal perikarya of control and the S. platensis following injury at day 28, which correlates with the functional locomotor recovery at this timepoint in our previous study. The group supplemented with spirulina, thus, revealed a better improvement in the fine ultrastructure of the spinal cord gray matter when compared to the control group thereby suggesting neuroprotective potentials of spirulina in mitigating the effects of spinal cord injury and inducing functional recovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optimal concentration of spirulina for rats was 180 mg/kg, and this concentration was found to be the most effective for rats.
“It was noticed that the optimal concentration of spirulina for rats was 180 mg/kg, and this concentration was found to be the most effective for rats [182].”
From Trends and Technological Advancements in the Possible Food Applications of Spirulina and Their Health Benefits: A Review. (2022) · cites this paper as [182]
Spirulina has a neuroprotective role in mitigating the effects of spinal cord injury and protective ability for the spinal cortical tracts and behavioral recovery in laboratory injured rat models.
“In addition, Abdullahi et al. [182] pointed out the neuroprotective role of spirulina in mitigating the effects of spinal cord injury and its protective ability for the spinal cortical tracts and behavioral recovery in laboratory injured rat models.”
From Trends and Technological Advancements in the Possible Food Applications of Spirulina and Their Health Benefits: A Review. (2022) · cites this paper as [182]
Spirulina has neuroprotective potential in mitigating the effects of spinal cord injury and causing functional recovery.
“thereby indicating the neuroprotective potential of Spirulina in mitigating the effects of spinal cord injury and causing functional recovery [49].”
From Beneficial Effects of Spirulina Consumption on Brain Health (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
In Sprague Dawley rats with partial crush injury at T12, Spirulina supplementation advanced the fine ultrastructure of spinal cord gray matter compared to control.
“In Sprague Dawley rats with partial crush injury induced at the level of T12, supplementation of Spirulina revealed an advance in the fine ultrastructure of spinal cord gray matter when compared to the control group”
From Beneficial Effects of Spirulina Consumption on Brain Health (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Abdullahi, D., Ahmad Annuar, A., & Sanusi, J.
- Affiliations
- Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (NG)
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- University of Malaya (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullahi, Dauda
- Venue
- Ultrastructural Pathology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-07-20
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4-6
- Pages
- 359-371
- ISSN
- 0191-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0758
- OpenAlex
- W3042261640
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ultrastructural Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut Pengurusan dan Pemantauan Penyelidikan, Universiti Malaya (PG 181-2015B)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, Spirulina platensis, neuroprotection, spinal cord gray matter, ultrastructure, neuronal perikarya, functional recovery, dietary supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dietary Supplements, Rats, Spirulina, Gray Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review