The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing Criterion Scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale
Abstract
This study demonstrates the usefulness of the KMSS and RDAS in distinguishing between the maritally distressed and nondistressed. For conceptual and statistical clarity, many marital interaction and marital therapy research measures, use a single cutoff score. It was determined that the cutoff score is 17 for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) and 48 for the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) for husbands, wives, and couples. An equivalency table of mathematical formulas is also presented, allowing the conversion of individual and couple scores from one measure of marital quality to another. It is now possible to convert a score from any one of a number of instruments (KMSS, RDAS, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Marital Adjustment Test, Revised Marital Adjustment Test) to an equivalent score as measured by another instrument.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has acceptable levels of construct validity and adequate internal consistency (Busby et al., 1995; Crane et al., 2000).”
From Internet-based treatment for vulvodynia (EMBLA) – Study protocol for a randomised controlled study (2021) · cites this paper as Crane et al., 2000
Citations
Cites
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,095
Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959) · Marriage and Family Living · doi:10.2307/348022 · Cited by 2,913
Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(84)80002-7 · Cited by 1,294
Journal of Marriage and Family
Léopold, T., & Raab, M. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/(issn)1741-3737 · Cited by 1,093
International Journal of Sociology of the Family
Mogey, J. M., Das, M. S., & Kurian, G. (1980) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351848 · Cited by 992
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x · Cited by 985
Concurrent and Discriminant Validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale
Schumm, W. R., Bergen, L. P., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352405 · Cited by 727
Clinical handbook of marital therapy
Jacobson, N. S., & Gurman, A. S. (1986) · Guilford Press eBooks · Cited by 438
Research on couples and couple therapy: What do we know? Where are we going?
Jacobson, N. S., & Addis, M. E. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.85 · Cited by 300
Nichols, C. W., Schumm, W. R., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567 · Cited by 245
Research on couples and couple therapy: What do we know? Where are we going?
Jacobson, N. S., & Addis, M. E. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.1.85 · Cited by 199
COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MARITAL THERAPY: 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AND PREDICTION OF RELAPSE
Jacobson, N., Schmaling, K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1987) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1987.tb00696.x · Cited by 184
Characteristics of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale in a Sample of 79 Married Couples
Schumm, W. R., Scanlon, E. D., Crow, C. L., Green, D. M., & Buckler, D. L. (1983) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.583 · Cited by 182
Factors of Marital Adjustment in Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
Kimmel, D. C., & van der Veen, F. (1974) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350994 · Cited by 174
Crane, D. R., Allgood, S. M., Larson, J. H., & Griffin, W. (1990) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352841 · Cited by 168
Marriage and Family Assessment: A Sourcebook for Family Therapy
(1984) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.457_8.x · Cited by 148
Intervention Strategies in a Suicidal Case
Mills, M. C. (1985) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.718 · Cited by 85
Predicting couples' response to marital therapy: A comparison of short- and long-term predictors.
Snyder, D. K., Mangrum, L. F., & Wills, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.61 · Cited by 85
Test-Retest Reliability of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale
Mitchell, S. E., Newell, G. K., & Schumm, W. R. (1983) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.545 · Cited by 70
Predicting couples' response to marital therapy: A comparison of short- and long-term predictors.
Snyder, D. K., Mangrum, L. F., & Wills, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.1.61 · Cited by 66
Criterion-Related Validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale
Schumm, W. R., Anderson, S. A., Benigas, J. E., Cutchen, M. B. M., Griffin, C. L., Morris, J. E., & Race, G. S. (1985) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.719 · Cited by 62
Improve, Refine, Recast, Expand, Clarify. Don't Abandon
Spanier, G. B. (1985) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352354 · Cited by 51
The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: A Further Brief Report
Grover, K. J., Bergen, L. P., Russell, C. S., & Schumm, W. R. (1984) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1984.54.2.629 · Cited by 45
FAMILY THERAPY OUTCOME RESEARCH: POTENTIAL PITFALLS AND PROSPECTS*
Jacobson, N. S. (1985) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1985.tb00604.x · Cited by 31
Fundamentals Of Marital Therapy
Crane, D. R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203765951 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- White M. B., 1994, Family Perspective, 28, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Support and Physical Health: Models, Mechanisms, and Opportunities
Uchino, B. N., Bowen, K. S., de Grey, R. K., Mikel, J., & Fisher, E. B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_12 · Cited by 289
The reliability of relationship satisfaction: a reliability generalization meta-analysis.
Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow, Z. B. (2011) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022441 · Cited by 289
Renshaw, K. D., Rodrigues, C. S., & Jones, D. H. (2008) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.586 · Cited by 239
The Seven-Item Short Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further Evidence for Construct Validity
Hunsley, J. D., Best, M., Lefèbvre, M., & Vito, D. (2001) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926180126501 · Cited by 230
McLean, L. M., Walton, T., Rodin, G., Esplen, M. J., & Jones, J. M. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2046 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Crane, D. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Family Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-60
- ISSN
- 0192-6187 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0383
- OpenAlex
- W2130669963
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
- ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, marital satisfaction, marital distress, cut-off values, criterion validity, score conversion, marital adjustment, couples, Dyadic Adjustment Scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review