Cited by 97Immunotoxicology and immune responsesAnimal testing and alternativesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

A Primer of Primate Pathology: Lesions and Nonlesions

Open access
Lowenstine, Linda J.·2003·Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

Nonhuman primates are important laboratory animals for biomedical, pharmacology, and toxicology research. To effectively use primates as models, their gross and histologic anatomy, physiology and natural history, as well as common health problems and the source from which the primate is obtained, must be known and understood by pathologists involved in study design and/or interpretation. The first very important lesson in the "primer" is: there is no such thing as a generic monkey. Brand names (ie, species and subspecies) are important. Several taxonomic groups of primates are used in research including: prosimians, such as galagos and lemurs; New World monkeys, particularily marmosets; Old World monkeys, especially macaques and baboons; and the chimpanzee, an African ape. Differences between taxa are exemplified by the glucocorticoid resistance of New World monkeys compared to Old World monkeys, which results in the requirement for Vitamin D3 and their high circulating levels of steroids such as cortisone and progesterone. Differences in ovarian histology between Old and New World monkeys probably relate to steroid receptor biology as well. There are also variations in disease manifestations, even among closely related primate species such as rhesus and cynomolgus macaques (cynos). For example type D retrovirus infection is accompanied by lymphomas in cynos, but not rhesus. The second important lesson in this "primer" is: "not test article related" does not always mean "norm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01926230390177668

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female macaques are characterized by a reddish, swelling-like appearance of the perineum during estrus, and histologically, they are rich in blood vessels and may appear as hemangiomas.

    “One of the characteristic species differences is that female macaques are characterized by a reddish, swelling-like appearance of the perineum during estrus, and histologically, they are rich in blood vessels and may appear as hemangiomas28.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowenstine, L. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Lowenstine, Linda J.
Venue
Toxicologic Pathology
Published
2003-01
Volume
31
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
92-102
ISSN
  • 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1601
OpenAlex
W2110814253
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
non-human primates, primate pathology, animal models, normal anatomy, type D retroviruses, lymphoma, macaque, cynomolgus macaques, rhesus monkeys, glucocorticoid resistance, ovarian histology, steroid hormone receptors, lymphoid nodules, prosimians, marmoset, chimpanzees
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Diseases, Primates, Species Specificity, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review