The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ten Strategies to Intentionally Use Group Work to Transform Hate, Facilitate Courageous Conversations, and Enhance Community Building
Abstract
The Association for Specialists in Group Work’s (ASGW) Special Initiatives Committee created a document offering 10 strategies for intentionally using group work to transform hate, facilitate courageous conversations, and enhance community building. Group workers can utilize these methods and resources to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion among group members in all types of groups and in various settings. These strategies provide a road map for group workers to use in navigating the complex process of unifying diverse individuals in a way that celebrates their commonalities and differences, while fostering difficult conversations in various group settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group work, as a microcosm of our society (Guth et al., 2019;Ward, 2011), reproduces and reifies larger societal, cultural, and social system dynamics and functioning (McCarthy et al., 2022;Peters & Luke, 2022).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Guth et al., 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work
Luke, M., Peters, H. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2023) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2023.2204054
Metadata
- Authors
- Guth, L. J., Pollard, B. L., Nitza, A., Puig, A., Chan, C. D., Singh, A. A., & Bailey, H.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University of Pennsylvania
- SUNY New Paltz
- University of Florida
- Idaho State University
- University of Georgia
- ORCID
- Chan, Christian D.
- Venue
- The Journal for Specialists in Group Work
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-24
- ISSN
- 0193-3922
- 1549-6295
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
