The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-Oppressive Research in Group Work
Abstract
Social justice and anti-oppression have emerged as the current force of practice in counseling and group work, however, anti-oppression has rarely been discussed in group work research. We identified critical issues involved in group work research, in relation to researcher/author statuses, participant characteristics, and methodological orientations. To address these issues, we approached anti-oppressive group work research, following Peters and Luke’s Principles of Anti-oppression. We discussed the application of the principles to anti-oppressive group work research, then broached critiques and implications involved in promoting anti-oppression practice, followed by our call for structural changes to facilitate anti-oppressive research in group work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it appears that some principles may present challenges for group workers to readily implement and/or these principles may require additional systemic supports or contextualization (Liu & Li, 2023).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Liu & Li, 2023
In the citing paper
“This limitation is further exacerbated by group workers' own lack of skill preparation (Grant et al., 2023;Stickl Haugen et al., 2021), intra-and inter-personal discomfort (Liu & Li, 2023;Wathen & Vargas, 2023), and the fear of systemic consequences (Bauman et al., 2023;Coker et al., 2023).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Liu & Li, 2023
In the citing paper
“Each of the six authorship teams highlighted the lack of critical, intersectional, and poststructural research exploring all facets of group work grounded in and focused on antioppression, further emphasized by Liu and Li (2023).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Liu & Li, 2023
In the citing paper
“In their article entitled Anti-Oppressive Research in Group Work, Liu and Li (2023) identified the tensions between social justice and anti-oppression as”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Liu & Li, 2023
Citations
Cites
Transformative Paradigm: Mixed Methods and Social Justice
Mertens, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689807302811 · Cited by 1,115 · cited 2×
“Besides, transformative mixed methodologies that encompass both qualitative and quantitative dimensions provide an avenue for addressing the complexities of research in culturally complex settings (Mertens, 2007).”
BackgroundMisra, S., Jackson, V. W., Chong, J., Choe, K., Tay, C., Wong, J., & Yang, L. H. (2021) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12516 · Cited by 328
The Oxford Handbook of Group Counseling
(2011) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195394450.001.0001 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- American Counseling Association, 2014, 2014 ACA code of ethics
- 10.1016/j.aip.2015.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2014.992507 · DOI
- 10.15241/ab.6.4.360 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2017.1338812 · DOI
- Brown L., 2015, Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches
- 10.1002/ceas.12222 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2011.632812 · DOI
- Castillo, W. & Gillborn, D. (2022). How to “QuantCrit”: Practices and questions for education data researchers and users. EdWorkingPaper: 22-546. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/v5kh-dd65 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933921003705958 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2010.492901 · DOI
- 10.1177/1473325014558664 · DOI
- 10.15241/td.9.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/capr.12080 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2011.tb02839.x · DOI
- 10.1037/14852-013 · DOI
- 10.1002/ceas.12123 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315753751-6 · DOI
- Goodman R. D., 2014, Decolonizing “multicultural” counseling through social justice, 147
- 10.1080/01933922.2016.1267826 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2022.2129939 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2018.1561778 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10447-021-09423-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcad.12074 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100991 · DOI
- 10.1177/1049732308329306 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2021.1950880 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2021.1950882 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2016.1264520 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/2326716X.2016.1139479 · DOI
- 10.1177/16094069221103665 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2022.2014744 · DOI
- 10.1080/2326716X.2020.1854133 · DOI
- 10.1002/ceas.12251 · DOI · Paper page
- Peters, H. C. & Luke (2023). Application of anti-oppression with group work. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 48(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2023.2170508 · DOI · Paper page
- Potts K., 2005, Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches, 255
- 10.1080/01933921003705974 · DOI
- 10.1080/02615479.2011.602965 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2016.1264522 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2016.1264521 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2010.492899 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2012.721482 · DOI
- Strega S., 2005, Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches, 199
- 10.1080/01933922.2017.1282569 · DOI
- 10.1177/07435584211028229 · DOI
- 10.1177/0011000019888763 · DOI
- 10.1080/01587919.2020.1763783 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00093.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work
Luke, M., Peters, H. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2023) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2023.2204054
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., & Li, D.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University
- The University of North Texas
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal for Specialists in Group Work
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-01-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-145
- ISSN
- 0193-3922
- 1549-6295
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
