The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying the 10 Principles of Anti-Oppression to Online Psychoeducational Groups: Steps to Intentional Changes in Emerging Technologies
Abstract
This article describes psychoeducational telehealth groups and considerations for applying Peters’ and Luke’s Principles of Anti-oppression to this form of group practice. Psychoeducational groups are among the most common group offerings by community mental health agencies, hospitals, schools, and communities. These groups focus on education, building skills, and implementing coping strategies around different topics related to mental wellness. They “promote personal and interpersonal growth and development. Such groups often work to prevent future difficulties and enhance personal attributes and abilities’.’ Within this vital work, group workers integrate principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging into their planning, curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation of the group.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite the prevalence of psychoeducational group work across counseling practice contexts and growing attention to online service delivery, Wathen and Vargas (2023) noted disproportionately little scholarship on psychoeducational groups in general and even less related to online psychoeducational group work or that infuses antioppression.”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Wathen & Vargas, 2023
Citations
Cites
The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019
Snoswell, C. L., Chelberg, G., De Guzman, K. R., Haydon, H. M., Thomas, E. E., Caffery, L. J., & Smith, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x211022907 · Cited by 397
Online group psychotherapy: Challenges and possibilities during COVID-19—A practice review.
Weinberg, H. (2020) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000140 · Cited by 206
Evidence for telehealth group-based treatment: a systematic review
Gentry, M. T., Lapid, M. I., Clark, M. M., & Rummans, T. A. (2019) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18775855 · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“In their online group literature review, Gentry et al. (2019) found 40 studies, including six randomized control designs.”
BackgroundTurgoose, D., Ashwick, R., & Murphy, D. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x17730443 · Cited by 148
Patient Attitudes Toward Telepsychiatry During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide, Multisite Survey
Guinart, D., Marcy, P., Hauser, M., Dwyer, M., & Kane, J. M. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/24761 · Cited by 112
Therapeutic groups via video teleconferencing and the impact on group cohesion
Lopez, A., Rothberg, B., Reaser, E., Schwenk, S., & Griffin, R. (2020) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2019.11.04 · Cited by 88
Puspitasari, A. J., Heredia, D., Gentry, M., Sawchuk, C., Theobald, B., Moore, W., Tiede, M., Galardy, C., & Schak, K. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.05.002 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“First, there needs to be more telehealth skill training and supervision by group counseling professionals (Puspitasari et al., 2021).”
BackgroundTelehealth Modalities for Group Therapy: Comparisons to In-Person Group Therapy
Marton, K., & Kanas, N. (2016) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2015.1096109 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Aasheim L., 2006, Introduction to group work, 269
- American Counseling Association. (2014). 2014 ACA code of ethics. https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.8090 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01933921003706014 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.3960052 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2020.1797444 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2011.632811 · DOI
- 10.1177/0011000005279962 · DOI
- Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs, 2015, 2016 CACREP standards
- 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00608.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14733145.2012.669772 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781351110679 · DOI
- 10.1177/0011000019843506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/32419 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10591-021-09570-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/gdn0000189 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2021.1984620 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2018.1561778 · DOI · Paper page
- Hawkins J., 2022, Developing Anti-racist practices in the helping professions: Inclusive theory, pedagogy, and application
- Humphrey D. L., 2021, The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy
- Ieva K. P., 2021, Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3
- 10.1080/07481756.2022.2160357 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph181910295 · DOI
- 10.1037/pst0000398 · DOI
- 10.1037/pri0000111 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-95451-2_1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/ceas.12251 · DOI · Paper page
- Peters H. C., 2023, Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 48, 84, 10.1080/01933922.2023.2170508 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1357633X20963893 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933921003705974 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmcd.12035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11920-019-1054-8 · DOI
- Renfro-Michel E., 2016, Using technology to enhance clinical supervision, 3
- 10.1089/tmj.2018.0237 · DOI
- 10.1002/cpp.2521 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2012.721482 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781544308555.n23 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2020.1794429 · DOI
- 10.22371/tces/0020 · DOI
- 10.22371/tces/0010 · DOI
- Wilson H., 2022, Digital delivery of mental health therapies: A guide to the benefits and challenges and making it work
- 10.1111/papt.12310 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01456612 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work
Luke, M., Peters, H. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2023) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2023.2204054
Metadata
- Authors
- Wathen, C. C., & Andrade Vargas, E.
- Affiliations
- Palo Alto University
- Venue
- The Journal for Specialists in Group Work
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-03-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-184
- ISSN
- 0193-3922
- 1549-6295
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review