The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychometric Properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire
Abstract
The Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) is a parent-completed measure designed to identify subtle motor problems in children of 8 to 14.6 years of age. The purpose of this study was to extend the lower age range to children aged 5 to 7 years, revise items to ensure clarity, develop new scoring, and evaluate validity of the revised questionnaire. Additional items with improved wording were generated by an expert panel. Analyses of internal consistency, factor loading, and qualitative/quantitative feedback from researchers, clinicians, and parents were used to select 15 items with the strongest psychometric properties. Internal consistency was high (alpha = .94). The expanded questionnaire was completed by the parents of 287 children, aged 5-15 years, who were typically developing. Logistic regression modeling was used to generate separate cutoff scores for three age groups (overall sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 71%). The revised DCDQ was then compared to other standardized measures in a sample of 232 children referred for therapy services. Differences in scores between children with and without DCD (p < .001) provide evidence of construct validity. Correlations between DCDQ scores and Movement Assessment Battery for Children (r = .55) and Test of Visual-Motor Integration (r = .42) scores support concurrent validity. The results provide evidence that the revised DCDQ is a valid clinical screening tool for DCD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blank, R., Barnett, A. L., Cairney, J., Green, D., Kirby, A., Polatajko, H., Rosenblum, S., Smits‐Engelsman, B., Sugden, D., Wilson, P., et al. (2019) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.14132 · Cited by 836
Self-citationHøyer, B. B., Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Pedersen, H. S., Góralczyk, K., Chumak, L., Jönsson, B. A., Bonde, J. P., & Toft, G. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1465-3 · Cited by 441
Frazier, T. W., Georgiades, S., Bishop, S. L., & Hardan, A. Y. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.004 · Cited by 409
Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes
Feliciano, P., Zhou, X., Astrovskaya, I., Turner, T. N., Wang, T., Brueggeman, L., Barnard, R., Hsieh, A., Snyder, L. G., Muzny, D. M., et al. (2019) · npj Genomic Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41525-019-0093-8 · Cited by 247
Genetic correlates of phenotypic heterogeneity in autism
Warrier, V., Zhang, X., Reed, P., Havdahl, A., Moore, T. M., Cliquet, F., Leblond, C. S., Rolland, T., Rosengren, A., LEAP, E.-A., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01072-5 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, B. N., Crawford, S. G., Green, D., Roberts, G., Aylott, A., & Kaplan, B. J.
- Venue
- Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-202
- ISSN
- 0194-2638 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3144
- OpenAlex
- W2080654684
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychometric Properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01942630902784761
- The paper
- Wilson, B. N., Crawford, S. G., Green, D., Roberts, G., Aylott, A., & Kaplan, B. J. (2009). Psychometric Properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942630902784761
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.