Cited by 29Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesAsthma and respiratory diseasesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Interdisciplinary planning for healthier communities: Findings from the Harlem Children’s Zone Asthma Initiative

Spielman, Seth E., Golembeski, Cynthia A., Northridge, Mary E., Vaughan, Roger D., Swaner, Rachel, Jean-Louis, Betina, Shoemaker, Katherine, Klihr-Beall, Sandra +9 more·2006·Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract

Health disparities that affect whole communities may involve factors like housing quality that lie at least partly within planners' realm of policy influence. This article demonstrates a link between housing and childhood asthma. The magnitude of the childhood asthma epidemic in Harlem in New York City and the commitment of engaged community partners led to an interdisciplinary, participatory, and multifaceted approach to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Harlem Children's Zone Asthma Initiative. Here we present the first year's data on environmental triggers in the homes of program participants, showing that intensive, community-based programs can reduce both home environmental triggers and adverse childhood asthma outcomes. This provides an example of a community-wide public health intervention that informs public policy and planning, and may provide a sustainable model for reducing childhood asthma in impoverished communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944360608976727

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rigorous evaluation of the Harlem Children's Zone has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes.

    “Rigorous evaluation of the HCZ has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes [50,51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spielman, S. E., Golembeski, C. A., Northridge, M. E., Vaughan, R. D., Swaner, R., Jean-Louis, B., Shoemaker, K., Klihr-Beall, S., Polley, E., Cushman, L. F., Ortiz, B., Hutchinson, V. E., Nicholas, S. W., Marx, T., Hayes, R., Goodman, A., & Sclar, E. D.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Harlem Children's Zone (US)
  • Harlem Hospital Center (US)
  • New York City Department of Education (US)
  • New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Planning Association
Published
2006-03-31
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
100-108
ISSN
  • 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0130
OpenAlex
W2114536267
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Robin Hood Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
childhood asthma, housing quality, environmental triggers, community-based intervention, public health planning, health disparities, participatory planning, community partnerships, public policy, low-income communities, family environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review