Interdisciplinary planning for healthier communities: Findings from the Harlem Children’s Zone Asthma Initiative
Abstract
Health disparities that affect whole communities may involve factors like housing quality that lie at least partly within planners' realm of policy influence. This article demonstrates a link between housing and childhood asthma. The magnitude of the childhood asthma epidemic in Harlem in New York City and the commitment of engaged community partners led to an interdisciplinary, participatory, and multifaceted approach to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Harlem Children's Zone Asthma Initiative. Here we present the first year's data on environmental triggers in the homes of program participants, showing that intensive, community-based programs can reduce both home environmental triggers and adverse childhood asthma outcomes. This provides an example of a community-wide public health intervention that informs public policy and planning, and may provide a sustainable model for reducing childhood asthma in impoverished communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rigorous evaluation of the Harlem Children's Zone has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes.
“Rigorous evaluation of the HCZ has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes [50,51].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Housing and Health: Time Again for Public Health Action
Krieger, J., & Higgins, D. L. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.5.758 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action
Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16040606 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
- Authors
- Spielman, S. E., Golembeski, C. A., Northridge, M. E., Vaughan, R. D., Swaner, R., Jean-Louis, B., Shoemaker, K., Klihr-Beall, S., Polley, E., Cushman, L. F., Ortiz, B., Hutchinson, V. E., Nicholas, S. W., Marx, T., Hayes, R., Goodman, A., & Sclar, E. D.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Harlem Children's Zone (US)
- Harlem Hospital Center (US)
- New York City Department of Education (US)
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Planning Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03-31
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-108
- ISSN
- 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0130
- OpenAlex
- W2114536267
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Robin Hood Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- childhood asthma, housing quality, environmental triggers, community-based intervention, public health planning, health disparities, participatory planning, community partnerships, public policy, low-income communities, family environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review