Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 80Transportation Planning and OptimizationSmart Parking Systems ResearchUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership: A Study of Households With Off-Street Parking in the New York City Region

Guo, Zhan·2013·Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Local governments’ minimum street-width standards may force developers to oversupply, and residents to pay excessively for, on-street parking in residential neighborhoods. Such oversupply is often presumed to both encourage car ownership and reduce housing affordability, although little useful evidence exists either way. This article examines the impact of street-parking supply on the car ownership of households with off-street parking in the New York City area. The off- and on-street parking supply for each household was measured through Google Street View and Bing Maps. The impact of on-street parking on car ownership levels was then estimated in an innovative multivariate model. The unique set-up of the case study ensures 1) the weak endogeneity between parking supply and car ownership and 2) the low correlation between off-street and on-street parking supply, two major methodological challenges of the study. Results show that free residential street parking increases private car ownership by nearly 9%; that is, the availability of free street parking explains 1 out of 11 cars owned by households with off-street parking. Takeaway for practice: These results offer support for community street standards that make on-street parking supply optional. They also suggest the merits of leaving the decisions of whether, and how many, on-street parking spaces to provide in new residential developments to private markets rather than regulation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944363.2013.790100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1006/juec.1998.2084 · DOI
  2. Balcombe R. J., 1993, The future of residential parking
  3. Ben-Akiva M. E., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand
  4. Ben-Joseph E., 1995, Residential street standards & neighborhood traffic control: A survey of cities’ practices and public officials’ attitudes (Working Paper)
  5. Ben-Joseph E., 2003, Subdivision regulations: Practices & attitudes a survey of public officials and developers in the nation's fastest growing single family housing markets (Working Paper No. WP03EB1)
  6. 10.1080/0042098984538 · DOI
  7. Brown M., 2007, Shifting landscapes of mobility: Reconfiguring space in the Mission District for automobiles (Master's thesis)
  8. Cervero R., 2010, Journal of Public Transportation, 13, 47, 10.5038/2375-0901.13.2.3 · DOI
  9. 10.3141/1805-08 · DOI
  10. Clarke P., 2010, Health & Place, 16, 1224, 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.007 · DOI
  11. Coevering P. V. D., 2008, The future of residential parking in the Netherlands: The impact of increasing car ownership on the character of residential areas
  12. 10.1559/152304010790588043 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.002 · DOI
  14. Department for Transport, UK, 2007, Manual for streets
  15. Epstein R. A., 2002, Journal of Legal Studies, 31, S515, 10.1086/342023 · DOI
  16. Ewing R., 2007, Urban Land, 66, 121
  17. Federal Housing Administration, 1936, Planning neighborhoods for small houses
  18. Figueroa J., 2010, San Gabriel Valley Tribune
  19. Forsyth A., 2007, Environment and physical activity: GIS protocols (Version 6.6, Section 6.6)
  20. Giuliano G., 2006, Transportation Research Part A, 40, 106
  21. Guo J., 2004, Addressing spatial complexities in residential location choice models
  22. 10.1080/01944360608976724 · DOI
  23. Heid J., 2004, Greenfield development without sprawl: The role of planned communities
  24. 10.3141/1805-05 · DOI
  25. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1967, Recommended practice for subdivision streets
  26. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010, Parking generation (4th ed.)
  27. Jenks M., 1996, Parking: Demand and provision in private sector housing development
  28. 10.3141/1685-20 · DOI
  29. Larcker D. F., 2005, On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research
  30. Litman T., 2004, Parking requirement impacts on housing affordability
  31. Litman T., 2007, Parking cost, pricing and revenue calculator
  32. 10.1080/10511482.2011.534386 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0739456X08323771 · DOI
  34. Mukhija V., 2006, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 296, 10.1080/01944360608976752 · DOI
  35. Neighborhood Streets Project Stakeholders, 2001, Neighborhood street design guidelines: An Oregon guide for reducing street widths
  36. Neumark D., 2006, Minimum wages and employment: a review of evidence from the new minimum wage research, 10.3386/w12663 · DOI
  37. New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, 1998, The 1997/1998 regional travel household interview survey (RT–HIS)
  38. Olmsted F. L., 1910, The basic principles of city planning, address before the Second National Conference on City Planning
  39. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.006 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034 · DOI
  41. Ryan J. M., 2001, Transportation Research Record, 1767, 1, 10.3141/1767-01 · DOI
  42. Salon D., 2005, Transportation Research Part A, 43, 180
  43. SFPark, 2010, SFMTA completes innovative citywide census of San Francisco parking
  44. Shoup D., 2005, The high cost of free parking
  45. Shoup D., 2006, Transport Policy, 13, 479, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.005 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/01944369508975620 · DOI
  47. Transport for London, 1999, The London parking supply study
  48. Urban Land Institute, 1947, The community builders handbook
  49. U.S. Census Bureau., 2007, Business pattern: Total number of paid employees
  50. U.S. Census Bureau., 2010, Decennial census: Total population
  51. U.S. Census Bureau., 2011, Characteristics of new single-family houses sold: Median and average lot size
  52. U.S. Census Bureau., 2012, 2012 National population projections
  53. Verhoef E., 1995, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29, 141, 10.1016/0965-8564(94)E0014-Z · DOI
  54. Village Home, 2009, . About Village Home
  55. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.08.002 · DOI
  56. 10.3141/2118-04 · DOI
  57. 10.1080/01944369508975617 · DOI
  58. Zabel J., 2011, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 571, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.06.002 · DOI

Cited by

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
Guo, Z.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Guo, Zhan
Venue
Journal of the American Planning Association
Published
2013-01-02
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
32-48
ISSN
  • 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0130
OpenAlex
W1930898307
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Smart Parking Systems Research
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
car ownership, off-street parking, housing affordability, housing development, free parking, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership: A Study of Households With Off-Street Parking in the New York City Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01944363.2013.790100
The paper
Guo, Z. (2013). Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership: A Study of Households With Off-Street Parking in the New York City Region. Journal of the American Planning Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2013.790100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.