The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Planning in the Face of Power
Abstract
Information is a source of power in the planning process. This article begins by assessing five perspectives of the planner's use of information: those of the technician, the incremental pragmatist, the liberal advocate, the structuralist, and the “progressive.” Then several types of misinformation (inevitable or unnecessary, ad hoc or systematic) are distinguished in a reformulation of bounded rationality in planning, and practical responses by planning staff are identified. The role and ethics of planners acting as sources of misinformation are considered. In practice planners work in the face of power manifest as the social and political (mis)-man-agement of citizens' knowledge, consent, trust, and attention. Seeking to enable planners to anticipate and counteract sources of misinformation threatening public serving, democratic planning processes, the article clarifies a practical and politically sensitive form of “progressive” planning practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A space for place in sociology
Gieryn, T. F. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463 · Cited by 2,370
On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258718 · Cited by 836
Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South
Miraftab, F. (2009) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095208099297 · Cited by 696
Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 · Cited by 353
The role of risk perception for risk management
Renn, O. (1998) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00119-1 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Forester, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Planning Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-03-31
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-80
- ISSN
- 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0130
- OpenAlex
- W2045338850
- Cited by
- 1,786
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planning in the Face of Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01944368208976167
- The paper
- Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American Planning Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.