Cited by 69Local Governance and PlanningPublic Policy and Administration ResearchLocal Government Finance and Decentralization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dimensions of Interjurisdictional Cooperation

Nunn, Samuel, Rosentraub, Mark S.·1997·Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract

Recommendations for solving the problems of urban regions often call for more cooperation among cities, to develop regional identities in a competitive world and to promote effective problem-solving among municipalities. Yet we know little about how interjurisdictional cooperation evolves, and few guides exist to help urban areas establish more cooperative environments. This paper addresses four questions about cooperation: (1) What is interjurisdictional cooperation conceptually and operationally? (2) What are the behavioral and tactical approaches by which it operates? (3) What are the institutional formats in which it evolves? (4) How can policy makers anticipate its outcomes? These questions are investigated using a descriptive model that links the objectives, tactics, institutional forms, and outcomes of interjurisdictional cooperation. Five case studies of regional cooperation are also analyzed. Our analysis indicates that cooperative organizations exhibit common structural and tactical schemes. However, there is no “one best way” to encourage cooperation; certain activities such as fiscal equalization may create richer and more intensive cooperation. Lastly, the success of interjurisdictional cooperation should be judged on the basis of the outcomes desired by the participating jurisdictions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944369708975915

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Abbott C., 1991, Historical Development of the Metropolitan Service District
  2. ACCD. 1994. Regional Directions. Allegheny Conference for Community Development. 1994. Pittsburgh. March
  3. Axelrod R., 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation
  4. Baker K., 1991, Minnesota's Fiscal Disparities Program
  5. Bergman E., 1993, Regions Reconsidered: Economic Networks, Innovation, and Local Development in Industrialized Countries
  6. Bryson J. M., 1993, Public Management: The State of the Art, 323
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1988.tb00533.x · DOI
  8. Castells M., 1994, Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes
  9. Clark G. L., 1989, Economic Restructuring and Political Response, 41
  10. 1991, Improving Local Services Through Intergovernmental and Public/Private Cooperation
  11. Donahue J. D., 1989, The Privatization Decision
  12. Downs A., 1994, New Visions for Metropolitan America
  13. Elkin S. L., 1987, The Politics of Urban Development, 25
  14. 10.2307/448462 · DOI
  15. Fox W. F., 1981, National Tax Journal, 34, 275, 10.1086/NTJ41862377 · DOI
  16. Gilbert D. A., 1979, Social Science Quarterly, 59, 681
  17. 10.1002/ncr.4100820208 · DOI
  18. Hartnett J. J., 1993, New York University Law Review, 68, 89
  19. Harvey D., 1973, Social Justice and the City
  20. Jones B. D., 1986, The Sustaining Hand: Community Leadership and Corporate Power
  21. Judd D. R., 1986, Cities in Stress: A New Look at the Urban Crisis, 145
  22. Ledebur L., 1993, All in It Together: Cities, Suburbs, and Local Economic Regions
  23. 10.1068/c110001 · DOI
  24. 1993, Economic Development Denver Style
  25. Mitchell J., 1992, Public Authorities and Public Policy: The Business of Government
  26. 1993, Directory of Regional Councils in the United States
  27. 10.1177/107808749503000303 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/089124249500900205 · DOI
  29. Peterson P. E., 1981, City Limits, 10.7208/chicago/9780226922645.001.0001 · DOI
  30. Pierce N., 1993, Citistates: How Urban America can Prosper in a Competitive World
  31. Reschovsky A., 1980, National Tax Journal, 33, 55, 10.1086/NTJ41862283 · DOI
  32. Rubin I., 1993, The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing.
  33. Rusk D., 1993, Cities Without Suburbs, 10.56021/9780943875491 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/089124249300700403 · DOI
  35. Schulman R., 1987, Urban Resources
  36. 1993, TMACOG: 25 Years of Regionalism
  37. 1992, Intergovernmental Decisionmaking for Environmental Protection and Public Works
  38. 10.1080/00343409312331347695 · DOI

Cited by

See all 69

Metadata

Authors
Nunn, S., & Rosentraub, M. S.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Planning Association
Published
1997-06-30
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
205-219
ISSN
  • 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0130
OpenAlex
W2092035159
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Keywords
interjurisdictional cooperation, regional cooperation, inter-municipal cooperation, urban environment, fiscal equalization, regional identity, cooperatives, regional problem solving, policy outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of Interjurisdictional Cooperation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01944369708975915
The paper
Nunn, S., & Rosentraub, M. S. (1997). Dimensions of Interjurisdictional Cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975915