The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation
Abstract
This paper explores the introduction of a group‐ware technology—Lotus Corporation's Notes®—into one office of a large organization and attempts to understand the changes in work practices and social interaction facilitated by the technology. The results reveal that a number of organizational elements, such as mental models (which affect how people understand and appropriate groupware) and structural properties (reward systems and workplace norms), significantly influence how group‐ware technology is implemented and used. Specifically, the findings suggest that in the absence of mental models that appreciate the collaborative nature of groupware, such technologies will be interpreted in terms of more familiar personal and stand‐alone technologies, such as spreadsheets. Further, in competitive and individualistic organizational cultures—where there are few incentives or norms for cooperating or sharing expertise—groupware on its own is unlikely to engender collaboration. Such products will be interpreted as countercultural, and to the extent that they are used, they will promote individual, not group aims. Recognizing the significant influence of these organizational elements appears critical to both researchers and practitioners of groupware technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Self-citationDisrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729
Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 · Cited by 713
When the Machine Meets the Expert: An Ethnography of Developing AI for Hiring
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16559 · Cited by 330
What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter?
Kling, R. (2007) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240701441556 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W.
- Venue
- The Information Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-250
- ISSN
- 0197-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122060728
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01972243.1993.9960143
- The paper
- Orlikowski, W. (1993). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. The Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1993.9960143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.