The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web
Abstract
While there is no question that the commercial development of the World Wide Web is still in its infancy and growing rapidly, this development faces a serious barrier to ultimate commercialization. In this article we develop the argument that the primary barrier to the successful commercial development of the Web is the current lack of consumer trust in this new commercial medium. This lack of trust is engendered primarily by the industry's documented failure to respond satisfactorily to mounting consumer concerns over information privacy in electronic, networked environments. We examine how such concerns are affecting the growth and development of consumer-oriented commercial activity on the World Wide Web and investigate the implications of these concerns for potential industry response. In the short run, the commercial development of the Web depends on giving consumers the opportunity to be anonymous when engaging in information exchanges and online transactions. Ultimately, however, commercial Web providers must come to realize that the Internet dramatically shifts the balance of power between a business and its customers, and therefore, radical new business strategies will be required for long-term success. Because the Web offers unprecedented opportunities for interacting with customers, strategies that take advantage of the medium's unique features are likely to reap important rewards in customer satisfaction, loyalty, and retention. Therefore, in the long run, the most effective way for commercial Web providers to develop profitable exchange relationships with online customers is to gain consumer trust by allowing the balance of power to shift toward more cooperative interactions between firms and their customers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics
Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002 · Cited by 1,425
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.316.77 · Cited by 1,205
Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon.
Verhoef, P. C., Neslin, S. A., & Vroomen, B. (2007) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.002 · Cited by 999
Metadata
- Authors
- Donna L. Hoffman, T. P. N.
- Venue
- The Information Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-139
- ISSN
- 0197-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2157653651
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/019722499128583
- The paper
- Donna L. Hoffman, T. P. N. (1999). Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web. The Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.