Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Lithic Procurement Strategies on Tool Curation and Recycling

McAnany, Patricia A.·1988·Lithic Technology

Abstract

>Significant variability is embedded within the concepts of tool curation and recycling. This variability is discussed within the contexts of both mobile and sedentary systems by employing a case study from the Eastern Maya Lowlands. The effect of procurement strategies on the protracted use of stone tools is outlined for systems with direct and indirect lithic procurement. The role of environmental variables in the interaction between human organization and technological needs is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01977261.1988.11754520

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not only physiographic elements must be considered; the landscape can be parceled and intergroup boundaries constructed; cultural partition of the landscape under these conditions can change lithic procurement strategies.

    “No solo los elementos fisiográficos deben ser tenidos en consideración, el paisaje puede ser parcelado y los límites intergrupos construidos; la partición cultural del paisaje bajo estas condiciones puede cambiar las estrategias de aprovisionamiento lítico (Ericson, 1984;McAnany, 1988).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAnany, P. A.
Venue
Lithic Technology
Published
1988-07
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
3-11
ISSN
  • 0197-7261
  • 2051-6185
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review