Staying ahead with generative artificial intelligence for learning: navigating challenges and opportunities with 5Ts and 3Rs
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)’s emergence is viewed as a disruptive technological advancement that has been beneficial for most educational purposes but also coupled with emerging challenges and potentially destabilizing effects. Given the unprecedented onset and surge in interests, education stakeholders are often pressured to adopt such emergent technologies with little space and time to seek better understanding and to attain literacy. This paper brings together existing contributions to identify a list of five common themes (5Ts) and various uses of generative AI for improving students learning and future education research. The challenges and opportunities from the use of generative AI in education were also explored, and as part of a rethink of how stakeholders can continue to be relevant in a dynamic learning environment with emerging technologies, three “R” guidelines (3Rs) are also proposed to aid educators and students to stay ahead of the curve in addressing challenges and embracing opportunities arising from the use of generative AI for learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Faculty grapple with issues of academic integrity and need more explicit guidance and training.
“Faculty, on the other hand, grapple with issues of academic integrity and the need for more explicit guidance and training (Garcia et al., 2024; Lee, 2024)”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 75 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Lee, A. V. Y.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Alwyn Vwen Yen
- ORCID
- Lee, Alwyn Vwen Yen
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-01-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-93
- ISSN
- 0129-4776 (ISSN-L)
- 0218-8791
- 1742-6855
- OpenAlex
- W4390975450
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-02-22)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Pacific Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- no funding
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- generative AI, artificial intelligence in education, educational technology adoption, AI literacy, future of education, disruptive technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review