Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 53Environmental Movements and Political EcologySocial Sciences and GovernanceAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Defending, Reclaiming and Reinventing the Commons

Mies, Maria, Bennholdt-Thomsen, Veronika·2001·Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement

Abstract

This study addresses the following questions: Who destroys the commons? Why have the commons to be reinvented? Can there be something like global commons? What can ‘new commons’ be in rich industrialized countries? The authors argue that there can be no reinvention of the commons in the industrialized North without a defense of the commons in the largely subsistence-based South. They identify two opposed concepts of ‘reinventing the commons:’ first, that which means to defend, to reclaim and to reinvent the commons from below, through grassroots action of local people for local people; and, second, the concept constructed and invented from above, namely the concept of ‘global commons,’ which is being introduced by international agencies and global players, mostly for the benefit of TNCs. The authors conclude that commons cannot exist without a community but equally the community cannot exist without economy, in the sense of oikonomia, that is, the reproduction of human beings within the social and the natural household. Hence, reinventing the commons is linked to the reinvention of the communal or commons-linked economy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02255189.2001.9669952

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 7 · Cited by 53

Metadata

Authors
Mies, M., & Bennholdt-Thomsen, V.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement
Published
2001-01
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
997-1023
ISSN
  • 0225-5189 (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-9100
OpenAlex
W2035338392
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
commons, global commons, new commons, multinational corporations, international organizations, oikonomia, communal economy, subsistence societies, North-South relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defending, Reclaiming and Reinventing the Commons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02255189.2001.9669952
The paper
Mies, M., & Bennholdt-Thomsen, V. (2001). Defending, Reclaiming and Reinventing the Commons. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2001.9669952

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.