Cited by 137Family Dynamics and RelationshipsAfrican Studies and EthnographySouth African History and Culture

Domestic diversity and fluidity among some African households in greater Cape Town

Spiegel, Andrew, Watson, Vanessa, Wilkinson, Peter·1996·Social Dynamics

Abstract

(1996). Domestic diversity and fluidity among some African households in Greater Cape Town. Social Dynamics: Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 7-30.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02533959608458599

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiegel, A., Watson, V., & Wilkinson, P.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Venue
Social Dynamics
Published
1996-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
7-30
ISSN
  • 0253-3952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-7874
OpenAlex
W2032111204
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
Keywords
African households, household composition, kinship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review