Cited by 4Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyCrustacean biology and ecologyHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

The effect of high lead concentrations on the mortality, mass and behaviour of Porcellio Laevis Latr. (Crustacea, Isopoda) in laboratory tests

Open access
Odendaal, J.P., Reinecke, A.J.·1998·South African Journal of Zoology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of high lead concentrations on the terrestrial isopod Porcellio laevis and to determine whether these animals could distinguish between lead contaminated and uncontami-nated leaves. In the acute toxicity tests the isopods were exposed to 0, 15, 30,45, 60, 75, 90 and 105 g/kg lead nitrate. Behavioural tests were conducted exposing the isopods to 0, 15 and 105 g/kg lead nitrate. In the acute toxicity tests the various concentrations differed significantly concerning mortality and weight loss of surviving isopods. The LC50 after 14 days exposure for P. laevis was 87.4 g/kg. The LC50 values obtained in this study are extremely high compared to those of earthworms. This is an indication of high tolerance for lead. The concentrations of lead found in the isopods were high and could give a possible explanation for the mortalities and mass losses observed, as lead at those concentrations could have disturbed the normal physiological functioning of the animals. The isopods avoided lead contaminated leaves in the behavioural tests, which could cause accumulation of leaf litter and thus a reduction of the decomposition rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02541858.1998.11448464

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Authors
Odendaal, J. P., & Reinecke, A. J.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Venue
South African Journal of Zoology
Published
1998-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
143-146
ISSN
0254-1858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159528688
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • South African Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
Porcellio laevis, terrestrial isopods, lead toxicity, lead nitrate, acute toxicity, LC50, mortality, weight loss, lead accumulation, avoidance behavior, leaf litter decomposition, heavy metal tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review