The DOI matches its Crossref record.
P'u-Ku Huai-En 僕固懷恩 and the T'ang Court: The Limits of Loyalty
Abstract
The third quarter of the 8th century is indisputably one of the two or three most crucial periods of the entire Tang dynasty, and yet the surface of its political history has scarcely been scratched. This was the period, we may recall, when the powerful state nurtured by Hsuan-tsung ;£ -=f? (712-755) broke down amid severe political divisions, when the An Lu-shan ^ Ufa jli rebellion ran its disastrous course, and when the central government was obliged to address itself to a long and painful task of reconstruction. Probably the dominance of military men throughout this period has acted as something of a deterrent to scholarly interest, for the consequences of brute force appear both too obvious and too little stimulating to the intellect. However, we must most certainly confront these events and these men, one of whom will in fact occupy our attention here. Aside from the general need, there are in addition good specific reasons for taking up the career of the loyalist general P'uku Huai-en eU 13 & JH (?-765). His is a fascinating, poignant story, of undeniable human interest. It is also an important story, closely interwoven with many of the principal events of the time. Not least, it is a story which offers a personal perspective as well as the official one contained in the formal histories, for, quite exceptionally in view of the subject's metier as soldier and his ultimate fate, he has left a long and candid statement of his own. Translated in full below, this document serves not only to express an individual point of view but also as a valuable source on the contemporary situation in general. Finally, and coincidentally, our subject stands out as an apparently typical product of that marginal frontier zone which, according to the well-known thesis of Professor Owen Lattimore, has played such a vital role in Chinese history.1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Prajñ ā Sutra says, ' In the palace of Ś akra the Lord, there is a hall called Fine Dharma. When the army of asura s was advancing to fi ght against the devas, the heavenly drum Enlightened Victor 32 sounded to warn that enemies were approaching. The lord of Heaven thus convened the heavenly multitudes to the Fine Dharma Hall, where they chanted ' mah ā prajñ ā p ā ramit ā . ' As a result, the”
From Miracles and military merit: the state’s sponsor to Bukong’s 不空 Buddhist enterprise (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cited by
Miracles and military merit: the state’s sponsor to Bukong’s 不空 Buddhist enterprise
Yang, Z. (2019) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2019.1639465 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Charles A.
- Venue
- Monumenta Serica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 423-455
- ISSN
- 0254-9948 (ISSN-L)
- 2057-1690
- OpenAlex
- W2466549062
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Monumenta Serica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
- Keywords
- Tang dynasty, An Lushan Rebellion, loyalty, generals, borderlands, Owen Lattimore, 8th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.