Building Collaboration Skills in 4th- to 6th-Grade Students Through Robotics
Abstract
Educators now recognize the importance of providing students early on with practice to build necessary 21st-century work-related skills, such as collaboration. School robotics programs are increasingly being used to meet the goals of STEM standards-based content assessment and the development of collaboration skills. However, limited investigations focus on how robotics programs develop collaboration skills in elementary-school-age children. The School Robotics Initiative (SRI) was developed to engage elementary-school students (grades 4–6) in problem-based experiences, so they may learn science and mathematical concepts and collaboration skills. The purposes of this study were to examine the processes of team formation and conflict resolution, and the behaviors between students, and between students and teachers, that encourage collaboration. Data collected included field observations from three classrooms over 3 years, supplemented with a review of robotics journals written by the children and annual teacher interviews. Findings revealed that the SRI promoted: (1) use of children’s strengths in team roles; (2) use of authentic, conflict-resolution strategies; (3) interpersonal connection, helping behavior, and sharing of knowledge between students; and (4) collaborative relationships between students and teachers. A model for developing collaboration skills in elementary-school students through robotics is proposed. Recommendations for future studies are offered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research suggests that interdisciplinary approaches, where coding is embedded within broader learning themes, can improve its effectiveness and sustainability in classroom settings.
“Research suggests that interdisciplinary approaches, where coding is embedded within broader learning themes, can improve its effectiveness and sustainability in classroom settings. 37”
From Integrating Play-Based Learning with Coding for Early Childhood Mathematics Education in Under-Resourced Schools (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century
(2012) · The National Academies Press · doi:10.17226/13398 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selepe, M. A., & Willemse, K. (2025) · Journal of Education and Learning Technology · doi:10.38159/jelt.2025695
“21 This collaborative approach not only enhances communication and peer learning but also encourages children to test different strategies for problem-solving in mathematics.”
- Authors
- Nemiro, J. E.
- Affiliations
- California State Polytechnic University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nemiro, Jill E.
- ORCID
- Nemiro, Jill E.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Childhood Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-03-31
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 351-372
- ISSN
- 0256-8543 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-2641
- OpenAlex
- W3014598304
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Childhood Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- collaboration skills, elementary school students, team formation, conflict resolution, teacher-student relationship, helping behavior, knowledge sharing, team roles, 21st century skills, STEM education, problem-based learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review