Cited by 38Educational Robotics and EngineeringTeaching and Learning ProgrammingInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Building Collaboration Skills in 4th- to 6th-Grade Students Through Robotics

Nemiro, Jill E.·2021·Journal of Research in Childhood Education

Abstract

Educators now recognize the importance of providing students early on with practice to build necessary 21st-century work-related skills, such as collaboration. School robotics programs are increasingly being used to meet the goals of STEM standards-based content assessment and the development of collaboration skills. However, limited investigations focus on how robotics programs develop collaboration skills in elementary-school-age children. The School Robotics Initiative (SRI) was developed to engage elementary-school students (grades 4–6) in problem-based experiences, so they may learn science and mathematical concepts and collaboration skills. The purposes of this study were to examine the processes of team formation and conflict resolution, and the behaviors between students, and between students and teachers, that encourage collaboration. Data collected included field observations from three classrooms over 3 years, supplemented with a review of robotics journals written by the children and annual teacher interviews. Findings revealed that the SRI promoted: (1) use of children’s strengths in team roles; (2) use of authentic, conflict-resolution strategies; (3) interpersonal connection, helping behavior, and sharing of knowledge between students; and (4) collaborative relationships between students and teachers. A model for developing collaboration skills in elementary-school students through robotics is proposed. Recommendations for future studies are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02568543.2020.1721621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research suggests that interdisciplinary approaches, where coding is embedded within broader learning themes, can improve its effectiveness and sustainability in classroom settings.

    “Research suggests that interdisciplinary approaches, where coding is embedded within broader learning themes, can improve its effectiveness and sustainability in classroom settings. 37”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nemiro, J. E.
Affiliations
California State Polytechnic University (US)
Corresponding author
Nemiro, Jill E.
Venue
Journal of Research in Childhood Education
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
351-372
ISSN
  • 0256-8543 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-2641
OpenAlex
W3014598304
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Childhood Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
collaboration skills, elementary school students, team formation, conflict resolution, teacher-student relationship, helping behavior, knowledge sharing, team roles, 21st century skills, STEM education, problem-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review