Cited by 25Reflective Practices in EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovations in Medical Education

Enhancing Learning in Clinical Placements: Reflective Practice, Self-Assessment, Rubrics and Scaffolding

Stupans, Ieva, March, Geoff, Owen, Susanne M.·2013·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

Professional preparatory health programmes generally involve clinical placements with a focus on integration of theory into real life practice. Reflective writing is often included in the assessment requirements for clinical placement courses. However enabling students to engage in deeper levels of reflective writing in action, on action and for action requires careful scaffolding and assessment task design within university clinical placement handbooks. The purpose of this case study was to explore iterative refinement of assessment exercises within clinical placement handbook activities. Specifically, the study examined students’ responses to counselling experiences in authentic pharmacy practice, with comparative analysis undertaken for the various versions of the assessment task. Results showed that provision of iteratively developed guidelines, provided to three different groups of students, to support students in the assessment task, increased the marks achieved for individual components of the assessment. The results provide insight into how the design of these types of assessment exercises can be improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2012.658017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reflection tools can improve understanding between the instructor and students, provide a common consent about how service-learning performance is to be judged, and make assessment more transparent and away from personal prejudices.

    “Indeed, systematic reflection tools can improve understanding between the instructor and students [37], providing a common consent about how service-learning performance is to be judged [38], making assessment more transparent and away from personal prejudices [37].”
  • Well-developed rubrics can reduce complexity and enhance the objectivity of assessment.

    “As well-developed rubrics can reduce complexity and enhance the objectivity of assessment [17,38]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stupans, I., March, G., & Owen, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Stupans, Ieva
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2013-08
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
507-519
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W2125613841
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
clinical practicum, reflective practice, reflective writing, self-assessment, rubrics, scaffolding, assessment task design, pharmacy education, counseling skills, evaluation guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review