Cited by 48Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback

Deneen, Christopher C., Hoo, Hui-Teng·2023·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

Teachers’ feedback literacy is a focus of increasing attention in higher education. It may be framed through intentional design decisions, inter-relational aspects of engagement and pragmatic considerations of enacted curricula. Thus, teachers’ feedback literacy is connected to both the enacted curriculum and students’ relationship to feedback. How these connections take shape in particular approaches to the curriculum, affecting students’ roles in feedback and evaluation is not as well-understood. This paper presents findings from an intervention aimed at developing students’ peer feedback and self-evaluation skills in an undergraduate business course. Peer feedback and self-evaluation are increasingly common modes of engaging students as active participants in feedback and evaluation processes. It is therefore worthwhile to understand the ways in which these processes affect and link teacher and student feedback literacy. Data was analysed from a 14-week course aimed at developing students’ competencies in self-evaluation, peer feedback and teamwork. Results are presented and discussed according to three major areas: how teacher’s feedback on student engagement with feedback served as affective ‘meta’ scaffolding, the trajectory of students’ growth in feedback literate self-evaluation, and the relationship of feedback literacy to trajectory of growth in teamwork competencies. The paper concludes with suggestions for further, crossdisciplinarity research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1002/ace.16 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/0260293990240405 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/02602938 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/02602930600679050 · DOI
  5. Boud D., 2013, Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well
  6. 10.4324/9781315740621 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/07294360.2019.1684455 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871 · DOI
  10. 10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_9 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1665166 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/14528-034 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x · DOI
  14. 10.5465/amj.2010.0492 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/02602931003786559 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Schön D. A., 1983, The Reflective Practitioner
  17. 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/014920639402000210 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/1170598 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H.-T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Deneen, Christopher C.
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
214-226
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W3203221625
Cited by
48
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
feedback literacy, self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher feedback, student engagement with feedback, teamwork skills, undergraduate business education, curriculum development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284
The paper
Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H.-T. (2023). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284