The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course
Open accessAbstract
Creativity is an important twenty-first century skill often overlooked in higher education curricula, particularly in the sciences. Students need opportunities to practice and demonstrate their creativity and gain an awareness of the importance of such skills to enhance their graduate capabilities. One way is to embed creativity into course assessment and link it to an employability context. This article describes how we used a staff-student co-creation framework to develop a group project assessment task encouraging 400+ first-year online students to express their creativity and demonstrate graduate attributes. We were also interested in students’ perspectives of empowerment, collegiality and authenticity. Our findings indicate the task enabled student groups to generate a diverse array of creative educational products for varied audiences. Most students valued the opportunity to express their creativity and were able to see the connection with creativity and other soft skills along with future opportunities and achievements. The group work aspects of the task helped many students feel connected to their peers and in control of their assessment. Students perceived that this assessment task reflected multiple aspects of authenticity. We demonstrate co-created creative assessment can be undertaken in large first year science classes to facilitate student learning and capability development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group assessment, peer-assessment, and peer feedback have been studied extensively in the context of enhancing self-regulated learning and self-reflection (Colson et al., 2022; Falchikov, 2013; Liu & Carless, 2006).”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Colson et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1080/03075070802644911 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602930600679050 · DOI
- Bowden J., 2000, Generic Capabilities of ATN University Graduates
- 10.1080/03075079312331382448 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360802444347 · DOI
- Cook-Sather A., 2014, Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty
- Creswell J. W., 2018, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
- Creswell J. W., 2007, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
- 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302 · DOI
- 10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1080/0729436042000235454 · DOI
- Gray A., 2016, World Economic Forum
- Haselberger D., 2012, Education and Culture DG Lifelong Learning Programme, European Union. Version, 1, 1
- 10.4324/9780203016503 · DOI
- 10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396 · DOI
- 10.1080/14703290802175966 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679 · DOI
- 10.1080/10632910903455884 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2014.982072 · DOI
- 10.11120/bmhe.2014.00008 · DOI
- Mezirow J., 2012, The Handbook of Transformative Learning, 73
- 10.1080/07294360.2018.1446415 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233 · DOI · Paper page
- Rampersad G., 2014, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15, 1
- 10.1080/02602938.2018.1492700 · DOI
- Ryan A., 2013, Flexible Pedagogies: New Pedagogical Ideas
- 10.1080/07294360.2019.1664998 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2018.1515195 · DOI
- World Economic Forum, 2015, New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology
- Yorke M., 2006, Employability in Higher Education: What It is-What It is Not. Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment design through co-creation
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Colson, N., Shuker, M.-A., & Maddock, L.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Colson, Natalie
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-12-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1149-1166
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W4200435955
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- creativity, co-creation, assessment design, genetics education, graduate competencies, employability, online learning, student empowerment, authenticity, soft skills, large classes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review