Learning to teach in a context of education reform: liberal studies student teachers' decision‐making in lesson planning
Abstract
Liberal studies is a new subject in the new senior secondary curriculum in Hong Kong. This study attempted to identify factors that shape liberal studies student teachers' decisions in lesson planning. Based on interview data and lesson plans developed by the student teachers, this article maintains that four factors interacted with the subject features of liberal studies to shape the student teachers' planning decisions, namely, teacher knowledge, curriculum requirements, materials and resources, and interaction with equal and more capable partners. This paper further looks into how teacher knowledge expresses itself at different stages of lesson planning. The findings suggest that to facilitate enquiry learning in students, liberal studies teachers need to adopt an enquiry stance in lesson planning. This paper argues that the limitations of liberal studies student teachers' content knowledge need to be addressed in teacher preparation programmes and suggests teacher networking as one way to strengthen novice liberal studies teachers' content preparation. The implications for teacher education are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peer lesson planning could provide evidence of PMTs' MKT because they structure the content in a way that is relevant within a particular context and for a particular group of students.
“Peer lesson planning (a form of approximations) could provide evidence of PMTs' MKT because they structure the content in a way that is relevant within a particular context and for a particular group of students (Lai & Lam, 2011;Sardo-Brown, 1996).”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Lai & Lam, 2011
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection
Sapkota, B., & Hayes, A. H. (2024) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12644 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lai, E., & Lam, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Lai, Edith
- Venue
- Journal of Education for Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03-21
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-236
- ISSN
- 0260-7476 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0540
- OpenAlex
- W2041099633
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy (publishedVersion)
- Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- liberal studies, lesson planning, pre-service teachers, teacher decision-making, educational reform, senior secondary curriculum, teacher knowledge, content knowledge, teacher networking, teacher education curriculum, novice teachers, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review