Brief mindfulness training in the social work practice classroom
Abstract
Social Work educators are increasingly concerned with discerning how to help students develop the affective, relational, and meta-cognitive skills needed for effective, resilient, and sustainable social work practice. A small but growing literature supports mindfulness training as a path to those ends. However, most mindfulness intervention studies, even those mentioning ‘brief intervention,’ have typically used fairly lengthy training programs, often 2–3 h per week for 6–8 weeks. It is unlikely that already over-committed social work practice classes would devote this amount of class time to these strategies. This concurrent mixed methods study examined whether very brief mindfulness training in undergraduate social work practice classes (100 min over the course of a 3.0 semester credit hour course) would influence outcomes on measures of mindfulness, emotional regulation, and empathy, as well as student perceptions of helpfulness in managing stress and meeting course goals. No significant differences were found on quantitative measures at post-test. However, results of the qualitative analysis suggest that even brief mindfulness exercises in social work practice classes are perceived by students as helpful for managing anxiety, staying present-focused with clients, reducing premature judgment, and feeling safe and connected in the classroom. Implications for social work education are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is some evidence to support the use of briefer mindfulness programmes to overcome existing barriers to effectiveness in health and social care whilst offering similar benefits as those seen in the more traditional 8-week programmes.
“The evidence available on the effectiveness of briefer MBPs is still scant (Hosseinzadeh Asl, 2021); however there is some evidence to support the use of briefer mindfulness programmes to overcome existing barriers to effectiveness in health and social care whilst offering similar benefits as those seen in the more traditional 8-week programmes (Bartlett et al., 2017; Thomas, 2017).”
From A randomised trial of Mindfulness-based Social Work and Self-Care with social workers (2023) · cites this paper as Thomas, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Thomas, J. T.
- Affiliations
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Jacky T.
- Venue
- Social Work Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-118
- ISSN
- 0261-5479 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1227
- OpenAlex
- W2547306250
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Work Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Keywords
- mindfulness training, brief intervention, undergraduate students, emotion regulation, empathy, stress management, anxiety, student perceptions, classroom climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review