The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How robust is the evidence for beneficial hydrological effects of urban tree planting?
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable urban water management initiatives are increasingly required to combat rapid urbanization and climate pressures. Initiatives include the role of tree planting, for which there is a need for strong evidence of benefits and drawbacks to support effective future planning. We report on the robustness of evidence from an assimilated database of urban hydrological impact studies which often had differing primary purposes. Consistent impacts were found at the local level, with trees reducing runoff and infiltration. Despite the consistency of evidence, much is undermined by the studies being somewhat lacking in robustness and scientific rigour. Many studies lack adequate controls, and models are often not strongly tested against observations. Moreover, evidence of impact at larger scales is lacking. Effects of tree characteristics were also investigated, such as maturity and species (for which evidence is consistent and detailed) and arrangement (for which there is less evidence). Realizing the full potential of trees in urban water management decision-making would benefit from more rigorous evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, while urban trees and their role in climate adaptation and mitigation is commonly researched, there are disagreements over ways to maximize benefits especially regarding their spatial distribution and the scale of beneficial impacts (43).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138237 · Cited by 2,387
McGrane, S. J. (2015) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084 · Cited by 1,070
Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. M. (2012) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006 · Cited by 1,062
Livesley, S. J., McPherson, E. G., & Calfapietra, C. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567 · Cited by 906
Miller, J. D., & Hutchins, M. G. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.06.006 · Cited by 745
Self-citationUrban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services
Tratalos, J. A., Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., Davies, R. G., & Gaston, K. J. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003 · Cited by 697
The role of trees in urban stormwater management
Berland, A., Shiflett, S. A., Shuster, W. D., Garmestani, A. S., Goddard, H. C., Herrmann, D. L., & Hopton, M. E. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017 · Cited by 644
Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment
McPherson, E. G., Simpson, J. R., Xiao, Q., & Wu, C. (2010) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011 · Cited by 377
The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities
Turner, J. B., & Cavender, N. D. (2019) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.39 · Cited by 321
Regulating urban surface runoff through nature-based solutions – An assessment at the micro-scale
Zölch, T., Henze, L., Keilholz, P., & Pauleit, S. (2017) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023 · Cited by 313
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Center for Watershed Protection, 2017, Review of the available literature and data on the runoff and pollutant removal capabilities of urban trees
- Gough D.A., 2013, Learning from research: systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: a quick guide
- Liu X., 2018, International conference on urban drainage modelling, 46
- Nielsen C.N., 2007, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 33, 231, 10.48044/jauf.2007.027 · DOI
- Stratford C., 2017, Do trees in UK-relevant river catchments influence fluvial flood peaks
- Xiao Q., 1998, Journal of Arboriculture, 24, 235
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, K., Kong, F., Yin, H., Destouni, G., Meadows, M. E., Andersson, E., Chen, L., Chen, B., Li, Z., & Su, J. (2024) · npj Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s42949-024-00162-z · Cited by 131
Jones, L., Anderson, S. G., Læssøe, J., Banzhaf, E., Jensen, A., Bird, D. N., Miller, J. D., Hutchins, M. G., Yang, J., Garrett, J. K., et al. (2022) · Nature-Based Solutions · doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100041 · Cited by 137
Self-citationGuo, Q., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Ye, Z., Deng, H., Hou, X., & Zhang, H. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14163885 · Cited by 98
Dowtin, A. L., Cregg, B. M., Nowak, D. J., & Levia, D. F. (2023) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104849 · Cited by 83
Li, J., Cui, P., & Yin, Y. (2023) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129756 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, H. J., Hutchins, M. G., & Miller, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hutchins, Michael G.
- ORCID
- Hutchins, Michael G.
- Venue
- Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-06-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1306-1320
- ISSN
- 0262-6667 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-3435
- OpenAlex
- W3159865331
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hydrological Sciences Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T000244/1)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (821016)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Keywords
- urban tree planting, urban hydrology, urban water management, stormwater runoff, infiltration, study design quality, tree species, tree maturity, tree arrangement, urbanization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How robust is the evidence for beneficial hydrological effects of urban tree planting? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02626667.2021.1922692
- The paper
- Baker, H. J., Hutchins, M. G., & Miller, J. D. (2021). How robust is the evidence for beneficial hydrological effects of urban tree planting? Hydrological Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1922692
