The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Governing Open Science
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A small group of companies concentrates the majority of published academic material, along with very high fees for publishing academic research.
“It is estimated that a small group of companies concentrates on the majority of published academic material, along with very high fees for publishing academic research (Cudennec et al., 2022).”
From Exploring the decentralized science ecosystem: insights on organizational structures, technologies, and funding (2025) · cites this paper as Cudennec et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1038/d41586-021-01338-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y · DOI
- 10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.006 · DOI
- Caretta, M.A., et al. 2022. Chapter 4: water. IPCC WGII Sixth Assessment Report, 213 p. IPCC, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ [Accessed 4 May 2022].
- 10.1080/02626667.2016.1230674 · DOI
- 10.1623/hysj.53.2.485 · DOI
- 10.1080/02626667.2020.1739397 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018WR023901 · DOI
- 10.24948/2022.02 · DOI
- 10.24948/2020.04 · DOI
- 10.5194/hess-26-647-2022 · DOI
- 10.24948/2017.01 · DOI
- 10.24948/2021.01 · DOI
- Koehrsen W., 2018, Unintended consequences and Goodhart’s Law
- 10.1002/2016WR018895 · DOI
- Marshall G., 2014, Don’t even think about it: why our brains are wired to ignore climate change
- McKie A., 2021, Global metrics experts attack Liverpool redundancy criteria
- 10.1080/17441692.2021.1896766 · DOI
- 10.1080/02626667.2020.1849707 · DOI
- 10.5194/hess-22-5735-2018 · DOI
- 10.24948/2022.01 · DOI
- Tyfield D., 2013, A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 7, 29
- 10.5194/piahs-366-1-2015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Díaz, F., Menchaca, C., & Weidener, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2025.1524222 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Cudennec, C., Sud, M., & Boulton, G.
- Affiliations
- International Science Council (ISC)
- ORCID
- Cudennec, Christophe
- Venue
- Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-14
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2359-2362
- ISSN
- 0262-6667
- 2150-3435
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review