Cited by 56Muscle metabolism and nutritionBiochemical effects in animalsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Absorption of creatine supplied as a drink, in meat or in solid form

Harris, Roger C., Nevill, Mary, Harris, D. Beorn, Fallowfield, Joanne L., Bogdanis, Gregory C., Wise, John A.·2002·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

We examined the plasma concentration curve obtained over 6 h after the ingestion of 2 g of creatine (Cr) (equivalent to 2.3 g Cr x H2O) contained in meat or in solution in five non-users of creatine supplements. Peak plasma creatine concentration was lower after the ingestion of meat but was maintained close to this for a longer period. Measurements of the area under the plasma concentration curve indicated approximate bioequivalence of creatine contained in meat with the same dose supplied in a solution. In a separate study, we examined the plasma concentration time curve after ingestion of solid Cr x H2O. Creatine ingested as a lozenge (crushed in the mouth and swallowed) or as a crystalline suspension in ice cold water resulted in a 20% lower peak concentration and 30-35% smaller area under the plasma creatine concentration curve than the same dose administered in solution. Despite a possibly lower bioavailability, 2.3 g Cr x H2O supplied in either solid form was nonetheless sufficient to raise the plasma concentration five- to six-fold in individuals with a mean body mass of 75.6 kg. We conclude that creatine administered as meat or in solid form is readily absorbed but may result in slightly lower peak concentrations than when the same dose is ingested as a solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/026404102317200855

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both 2.5 g CrM in solution and 408 g lightly cooked steak containing 5.4 g creatine resulted in similar increases in area under the curve (AUC) values (507 ± 205 and 518 ± 153 μmol/h/L, respectively).

    “Nevertheless, both strategies resulted in similar increases in area under the curve (AUC) values (507 ± 205 and 518 ± 153 µmol/h/L, respectively).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, R. C., Nevill, M., Harris, D. B., Fallowfield, J. L., Bogdanis, G. C., & Wise, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Chichester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2002-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
147-151
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1973092600
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
creatine, creatine supplementation, bioequivalence, bioavailability
MeSH terms
Adult, Biological Availability, Creatine, Female, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Male, Meat, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review