Effect of the movement speed of resistance training exercises on sprint and strength performance in concurrently training elite junior sprinters
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of 7 weeks of high- and low-velocity resistance training on strength and sprint running performance in nine male elite junior sprint runners (age 19.0+/-1.4 years, best 100 m times 10.89+/-0.21 s; mean +/- s). The athletes continued their sprint training throughout the study, but their resistance training programme was replaced by one in which the movement velocities of hip extension and flexion, knee extension and flexion and squat exercises varied according to the loads lifted (i.e. 30-50% and 70-90% of 1-RM in the high- and low-velocity training groups, respectively). There were no between-group differences in hip flexion or extension torque produced at 1.05, 4.74 or 8.42 rad x s(-1), 20 m acceleration or 20 m 'flying' running times, or 1-RM squat lift strength either before or after training. This was despite significant improvements in 20 m acceleration time (P < 0.01), squat strength (P < 0.05), isokinetic hip flexion torque at 4.74 rad x s(-1) and hip extension torque at 1.05 and 4.74 rad x s(-1) for the athletes as a whole over the training period. Although velocity-specific strength adaptations have been shown to occur rapidly in untrained and nonconcurrently training individuals, the present results suggest a lack of velocity-specific performance changes in elite concurrently training sprint runners performing a combination of traditional and semi-specific resistance training exercises.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the majority of previous isoinertial research, actual training velocities were not quantified.
“However, in the majority of previous isoinertial research actual training velocities were not quantifi ed [ 2 , 5 , 10 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 35 , 40 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [5]
Very little scientific evidence exists on the effect of movement velocity on measures of dynamic athletic performance.
“However, very little scientifi c evidence exists on the eff ect of movement velocity on measures of dynamic athletic performance [ 5 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 ] .”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [5]
The sprint improvements (1-3%) are similar to those observed in other studies but were obtained with a lower degree of effort during RT and without sprint training.
“These improvements (1-3 %) are similar to those observed in other studies [ 5 , 24 ] but were obtained with a lower degree of eff ort during RT and without sprint training.”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Training-induced alterations of the in vivo force-velocity relationship of human muscle
Caiozzo, V. J., Perrine, J. J., & Edgerton, V. R. (1981) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1981.51.3.750 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance
Pareja-Blanco, F., Rodríguez-Rosell, D., Sánchez-Medina, L., Gorostiaga, E., & González-Badillo, J. (2014) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363985 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Davies, T. B., Kuang, K., Orr, R., Halaki, M., & Hackett, D. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0676-4 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Teo, S. Y. M., Newton, M. J., Newton, R. U., Dempsey, A. R., & Fairchild, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001379 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
A comparison of traditional and novel metrics to quantify resistance training
Marston, K. J., Peiffer, J. J., Newton, M. J., & Scott, B. R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05953-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Internal validity in resistance training research: a systematic review.
Makaruk, H., Starzak, M., Płaszewski, M., & Winchester, J. B. (2022) · Journal of Sports Science and Medicine · doi:10.52082/jssm.2022.308 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blazevich, A. J., & Jenkins, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 981-990
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2148588578
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- resistance training, movement speed, sprint performance, concurrent training, squat strength, isokinetic torque, hip extension, hip flexion, knee extension, knee flexion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Running, Time Factors, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review