The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents
Abstract
This aim of this study was to compare the new Actigraph (GT1M) with the widely used Model 7164. Seven days of free-living physical activity were measured simultaneously using both the Model 7164 and GT1M in 30 Indian adolescents (mean age 15.8 years, s = 0.6). The GT1M was on average 9% lower per epoch than model 7164, thus a correction factor of 0.91 is suggested for comparison between the two monitors. The differences between monitors increased in magnitude with intensity of activity (P < 0.001) but remained randomly distributed (r = 0.01, P = 0.96). No significant difference was observed between monitors for time spent in moderate (P = 0.31) and vigorous (P = 0.34) physical activity when using the same epoch length. The Model 7164 classified less time as sedentary (P < 0.001) and more time as light-intensity activity (P < 0.001) than the GT1M. In conclusion, data from the GT1M can be compared with historical data using average counts per minute with a correction factor, and the two models might be comparable for assessing time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity in children when using the same epoch length.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the more recent Actigraph GT1M model has a consistent bias of 9% relative to model 7164,24”
From Timing of the decline in physical activity in childhood and adolescence: gateshead millennium cohort study (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer
FREEDSON, P. S., MELANSON, E., & SIRARD, J. (1998) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 · Cited by 3,825
Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002 · Cited by 3,817
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(2010) · Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1111/(issn)1440-6047 · Cited by 1,852
Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart
Brage, S., Brage, N., Franks, P. W., Ekelund, U., & Wareham, N. J. (2005) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602118 · Cited by 690
Eston, R. G., Rowlands, A. V., & Ingledew, D. K. (1998) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.362 · Cited by 643
Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children
Ekelund, U., SJÖSTRÖM, M., Yngve, A., Poortvliet, E., Nilsson, A. E., Froberg, K., Wedderkopp, N., & Westerterp, K. R. (2001) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200102000-00017 · Cited by 441
Nilsson, A. E., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., & Söström, M. (2002) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.14.1.87 · Cited by 274
Obesity among pre-adolescent and adolescents of a developing country (India).
Chhatwal, J., Verma, M., & Riar, S. K. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 228
McGuire, M. T., Neumark‐Sztainer, D., & Story, M. T. (2002) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.14.1.75 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children
Evenson, K. R., Catellier, D. J., Gill, K., Ondrak, K. S., & McMurray, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410802334196 · Cited by 2,677
Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors
Sasaki, J. E., John, D., & Freedson, P. S. (2011) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003 · Cited by 1,317
Using Accelerometers in Youth Physical Activity Studies: A Review of Methods
Cain, K. L., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Dyck, D. V., & Calhoon, L. (2013) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.10.3.437 · Cited by 735
Ferguson, T., Rowlands, A. V., Olds, T., & Maher, C. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0201-9 · Cited by 468
Farooq, M. A., Parkinson, K. N., Adamson, A. J., Pearce, M. S., Reilly, J. K., Hughes, A. R., Janssen, X., Basterfield, L., & Reilly, J. J. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096933 · Cited by 418
“23 Since the Actigraph cut-off points used in this study were derived from studies using Actigraph model 7164 and the more recent Actigraph GT1M model has a consistent bias of 9% relative to model 7164, 24 a +9% correction was applied to the raw accelerometry data before applying cut-off points.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Corder, K., Brage, S., Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., Wareham, N., & Ekelund, U.
- Affiliations
- Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
- MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
- M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetes Research Centre (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Corder, Kirsten
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1607-1611
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W1984764943
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Keywords
- ActiGraph GT1M, accelerometer comparison, free-living physical activity, adolescents, epoch length, activity intensity classification, sedentary time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, Indian adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Adolescent, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, India, Male, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Movement, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
