The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationships between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female athletes
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the relationships between various field tests in female athletes. Altogether, 83 high school soccer, 51 college soccer, and 79 college lacrosse athletes completed tests for linear sprinting, countermovement jump, and agility in a single session. Linear sprints (9.1, 18.3, 27.4, and 36.6 m) and agility tests (Illinois and pro-agility) were evaluated using infrared timing gates, while countermovement jump height was assessed using an electronic timing mat. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients (r) were used to determine the strength and directionality of the relationship between tests and coefficients of determination (r2) were used to examine the amount of explained variance between tests. All of the performance scores were statistically correlated with each other; however, the coefficients of determination were low, moderate, and high depending on the test pairing. Linear sprint split times were strongly correlated with each other (r= 0.775 to 0.991). The relationship between countermovement jump height and linear sprinting was stronger with the longer distances (27.4 and 36.6 m) than with the shorter distances (9.1 and 18.3 m), and showed a stronger relationship within the college athletes (r= -0.658 to -0.788) than high school soccer players (r= -0.491 to -0.580). The Illinois and pro-agility tests were correlated (r > or = 0.600) with each other as well as with linear sprint times. The results of this study indicate that linear sprinting, agility, and vertical jumping are independent locomotor skills and suggest a variety of tests ought to be included in an assessment protocol for high school and college female athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role and Development of Sprinting Speed in Soccer
Haugen, T. A., Tønnessen, E., Hisdal, J., & Seiler, S. (2014) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0121 · Cited by 334
Nimphius, S., Callaghan, S. J., Spiteri, T., & Lockie, R. G. (2016) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001421 · Cited by 316
Applied Physiology of Female Soccer: An Update
Datson, N., Hulton, A., Andersson, H., Lewis, T., Weston, M., Drust, B., & Gregson, W. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0199-1 · Cited by 300
Change of Direction and Agility Tests: Challenging Our Current Measures of Performance
Nimphius, S., Callaghan, S. J., Bezodis, N. E., & Lockie, R. G. (2018) · Strength & Conditioning Journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000309 · Cited by 282
Alemdaroğlu, U. (2012) · Journal of Human Kinetics · doi:10.2478/v10078-012-0016-6 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Vescovi, J. D., & Mcguigan, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-107
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2079417717
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female athletes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02640410701348644
- The paper
- Vescovi, J. D., & Mcguigan, M. R. (2008). Relationships between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701348644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.