Innovations in athletic preparation: Role of substrate availability to modify training adaptation and performance
Abstract
World records for athletic events continue to improve and in the search for superior methods to gain a competitive edge, coaches and athletes are constantly searching for the latest "magic bullet". Although it is assumed that optimal adaptation to the demands of repeated training sessions requires a diet that can sustain muscle energy reserves, this premise does not consider the unsolved longstanding question of whether it is a lack or a surplus of a substrate that triggers the training adaptation. As such, recent scientific enquiry has re-focused attention on the role of substrate availability before, during, and after training to amplify the training adaptation. There has also been a resurgence of interest in the potential for protein ingestion to improve performance and/or promote training-induced adaptations in skeletal muscle. Altitude training (real or simulated) is now an accepted part of competition preparation for many athletic events, and such interventions attract their own nutritional issues. These and other diet-training interactions with the potential to alter training adaptation and performance are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings show the importance of pacing in determining performance and suggest factors other than physiological or metabolic characteristics previously reported in low glycogen availability studies.
“These findings show the importance of pacing in the determination of performance, and suggest factors other than physiological or metabolic characteristics that have been previously reported in studies focusing on the effect of low glycogen availability during training [7].”
From Periodization of carbohydrate intake: short-term effect on performance (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Hawley, J. A., Gibala, M. J., & Bermon, S.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Austrian Institute for Sports Medicine (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Hawley, John A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- S115-S124
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2077969258
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- athletic performance, training effects, substrate availability, energy metabolism, protein intake, altitude training, simulated altitude training, skeletal muscle, sports nutrition
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Physical Endurance, Sports, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Muscle, Skeletal, Micronutrients, Athletic Performance, Resistance Training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review