Cited by 240Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Influence of recovery time on post-activation potentiation in professional rugby players

Open access
Kilduff, Liam P., Owen, Nick, Bevan, Huw, Bennett, Mark, Kingsley, Mike I. C., Cunningham, Dan·2008·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Following a bout of heavy resistance training, the muscle is in both a fatigued and potentiated state with subsequent muscle performance depending on the balance between these two factors. To date, there is no uniform agreement about the optimal acute recovery required between the heavy resistance training and subsequent muscle performance to gain performance benefits. The aim of the present study was to determine the recovery time required to observe enhanced muscle performance following a bout of heavy resistance training. Twenty professional rugby players performed a countermovement jump at baseline and approximately 15 s, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 min after a bout of heavy resistance training (three sets of three repetitions at 87% one-repetition maximum squat). Power output, jump height, and peak rate of force development were determined for all countermovement jumps. Despite an initial decrease in countermovement jump performance after the heavy resistance training (P<0.001), participants' performance increased significantly following 8 min recovery (P<0.001) (i.e. jump height increased by 4.9%, s=3.0). The findings suggest that muscle performance during a countermovement jump can be markedly enhanced following bouts of heavy resistance training provided that adequate recovery (approximately 8 min) is allowed between the heavy resistance training and the explosive activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640410701784517

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 240

Authors
Kilduff, L. P., Owen, N., Bevan, H., Bennett, M., Kingsley, M. I. C., & Cunningham, D.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kilduff, Liam P.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2008-06
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
795-802
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1965800999
Cited by
240
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
post-activation potentiation, recovery time, high-load resistance training, countermovement jump, rugby players, muscle fatigue, rate of force development, jump height, squatting, explosive performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Football, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review