A meta-study of qualitative research examining stressor appraisals and coping among adolescents in sport
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to create an integrated theoretical perspective of the qualitative adolescent sport stressor appraisal and coping literature. A secondary aim was to critique theoretical and methodological issues in the extant literature. Following database searches, 20 studies were retained for analysis. Meta-data, meta-theory, and meta-method analyses were conducted followed by a final meta-synthesis of findings. Analyses produced four themes: contextual and dynamic stressor appraisals, contextual and dynamic coping, coping resources and processes of acquisition, and social networks as assets and liabilities. Findings highlight the need for precise use of theory in the study of coping. Finally, while several data collection methods have been used, there is scope for greater methodological diversity to advance our understanding of coping among adolescent athletes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Tamminen, K. A., & Holt, N. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Tamminen, Katherine A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1563-1580
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2026748570
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Commercializations Promotion Agency for R and D Outcomes
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- stress appraisal, coping, youth athletes, sport stress, coping resources, social networks, theoretical integration, qualitative evidence synthesis, methodological critique
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Humans, Social Support, Sports, Stress, Psychological, Athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review