The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time–motion, heart rate, perceptual and motor behaviour demands in small-sides soccer games: Effects of pitch size
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine physical, physiological, and motor responses and perceived exertion during different soccer drills. In small-sided games, the individual playing area (∼ 275 m², ∼ 175 m², and ∼ 75 m²) was varied while the number of players per team was kept constant: 5 vs. 5 plus goalkeepers. Participants were ten male youth soccer players. Each session comprised three small-sided game formats, which lasted 8 min each with a 5-min passive rest period between them. A range of variables was recorded and analysed for the three drills performed over three training sessions: (a) physiological, measured using Polar Team devices; (b) physical, using GPS SPI elite devices; (c) perceived exertion, rated using the CR-10 scale; and (d) motor response, evaluated using an observational tool that was specially designed for this study. Significant differences were observed for most of the variables studied. When the individual playing area was larger, the effective playing time, the physical (total distance covered; distances covered in low-intensity running, medium-intensity running, and high-intensity running; distance covered per minute; maximum speed; work-to-rest ratio; sprint frequency) and physiological workload (percent maximum heart rate; percent mean heart rate; time spent above 90% maximum heart rate), and the rating of perceived exertion were all higher, while certain motor behaviours were observed less frequently (interception, control and dribble, control and shoot, clearance, and putting the ball in play). The results show that the size of the pitch should be taken into account when planning training drills, as it influences the intensity of the task and the motor response of players.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bangsbo, J., Iaia, F. M., & Krustrup, P. (2008) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200838010-00004 · Cited by 1,463
Cited by
Development of a skill acquisition periodisation framework for high-performance sport
Farrow, D., & Robertson, S. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0646-2 · Cited by 125
Training and competition workloads and fatigue responses of elite junior cricket players.
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Naughton, G., Farhart, P., & Chapman, P. (2013) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.5.517 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Casamichana, D., & Castellano, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1615-1623
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2071784257
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.