Cited by 132Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The effects of rest intervals on jumping performance: A meta-analysis on post-activation potentiation studies

Gouvêa, André Luiz, Fernandes, Igor Alexandre, César, Eurico Peixoto, Silva, Wagner Antônio Barbosa, Gomes, Paulo Sergio Chagas·2013·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analytic review was to examine the extent and quality of research on the post-activation potentiation acute effect of rest interval manipulation on jumping performance. This manuscript adopted the recommendations from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Criteria eligibility included crossover, randomised, non-randomised and counterbalanced studies that observed the voluntary muscle action-induced post-activation potentiation on jumping performance. Fourteen studies selected by two independent raters were included in the analysis. The rest intervals involved ranges including 0-3, 4-7, 8-12 and ≥16 min. The results demonstrated medium effect sizes for rest intervals 0-3 and 8-12 min (-0.25, confidence interval (CI): -0.51 to 0.01 for 0-3 min; 0.24, CI: -0.02 to 0.49 for 8-12 min) and a small effect for other ranges (0.15, CI: -0.08 to 0.38 for 4-7 min; 0.07, CI: -0.21 to 0.24 for ≥16 min). There was no evidence of heterogeneity for sub-groups (I2 = 0%; P < 0.001) and no indication of publication bias (Egger's test, P = 0.179). While a rest interval of 0-3 min induced a detrimental effect on jump performance, the range including 8-12 min had a beneficial impact on jump height. Findings suggest that the rest interval manipulation seems to affect post-activation potentiation magnitude and jump height.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2012.738924

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 132

Authors
Gouvêa, A. L., Fernandes, I. A., César, E. P., Silva, W. A. B., & Gomes, P. S. C.
Affiliations
University Gama Filho (BR)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2013-03
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
459-467
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1991779207
Cited by
132
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
post-activation potentiation, rest periods, jump performance, jump height, acute effects, muscle action, neuromuscular potentiation
MeSH terms
Humans, Movement, Rest, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review