Peak treadmill running velocity during the V O2max test predicts running performance
Abstract
Twenty specialist marathon runners and 23 specialist ultra-marathon runners underwent maximal exercise testing to determine the relative value of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), peak treadmill running velocity, running velocity at the lactate turnpoint, VO2 at 16 km h-1, % VO2max at 16 km h-1, and running time in other races, for predicting performance in races of 10-90 km. Race time at 10 or 21.1 km was the best predictor of performance at 42.2 km in specialist marathon runners and at 42.2 and 90 km in specialist ultra-marathon runners (r = 0.91-0.97). Peak treadmill running velocity was the best laboratory-measured predictor of performance (r = -0.88(-)-0.94) at all distances in ultra-marathon specialists and at all distances except 42.2 km in marathon specialists. Other predictive variables were running velocity at the lactate turnpoint (r = -0.80(-)-0.92); % VO2max at 16 km h-1 (r = 0.76-0.90) and VO2max (r = 0.55(-)-0.86). Peak blood lactate concentrations (r = 0.68-0.71) and VO2 at 16 km h-1 (r = 0.10-0.61) were less good predictors. These data indicate: (i) that in groups of trained long distance runners, the physiological factors that determine success in races of 10-90 km are the same; thus there may not be variables that predict success uniquely in either 10 km, marathon or ultra-marathon runners, and (ii) that peak treadmill running velocity is at least as good a predictor of running performance as is the lactate turnpoint. Factors that determine the peak treadmill running velocity are not known but are not likely to be related to maximum rates of muscle oxygen utilization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies of specialist distance runners have found that 10-km personal best time is a good predictor of marathon performance.
“Furthermore, previous studies of specialist distance runners have found that 10-km personal best time is a good predictor of marathon performance [29]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 361
- Authors
- Noakes, T. D., Myburgh, K. H., & Schall, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-45
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W1979982526
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- University of Cape Town
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- VO2max, running performance prediction, marathon runners, blood lactate, race time, long-distance running
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Exercise Test, Heart Rate, Humans, Lactates, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Physical Fitness, Probability, Running
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review