Cited by 361Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologySport Psychology and Performance

Peak treadmill running velocity during the V O2max test predicts running performance

Noakes, T.D., Myburgh, K.H., Schall, R.·1990·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Twenty specialist marathon runners and 23 specialist ultra-marathon runners underwent maximal exercise testing to determine the relative value of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), peak treadmill running velocity, running velocity at the lactate turnpoint, VO2 at 16 km h-1, % VO2max at 16 km h-1, and running time in other races, for predicting performance in races of 10-90 km. Race time at 10 or 21.1 km was the best predictor of performance at 42.2 km in specialist marathon runners and at 42.2 and 90 km in specialist ultra-marathon runners (r = 0.91-0.97). Peak treadmill running velocity was the best laboratory-measured predictor of performance (r = -0.88(-)-0.94) at all distances in ultra-marathon specialists and at all distances except 42.2 km in marathon specialists. Other predictive variables were running velocity at the lactate turnpoint (r = -0.80(-)-0.92); % VO2max at 16 km h-1 (r = 0.76-0.90) and VO2max (r = 0.55(-)-0.86). Peak blood lactate concentrations (r = 0.68-0.71) and VO2 at 16 km h-1 (r = 0.10-0.61) were less good predictors. These data indicate: (i) that in groups of trained long distance runners, the physiological factors that determine success in races of 10-90 km are the same; thus there may not be variables that predict success uniquely in either 10 km, marathon or ultra-marathon runners, and (ii) that peak treadmill running velocity is at least as good a predictor of running performance as is the lactate turnpoint. Factors that determine the peak treadmill running velocity are not known but are not likely to be related to maximum rates of muscle oxygen utilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640419008732129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 361

Authors
Noakes, T. D., Myburgh, K. H., & Schall, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
1990-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1979982526
Cited by
361
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • University of Cape Town
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
VO2max, running performance prediction, marathon runners, blood lactate, race time, long-distance running
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Test, Heart Rate, Humans, Lactates, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Physical Fitness, Probability, Running

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review