ChatGPT-Powered Chatbot as a Green Evangelist: An Innovative Path toward Sustainable Consumerism in E-Commerce
Abstract
The purpose of the current article is to propose the construction of ChatGPT as a green evangelist (CGGE) and to develop and validate the CGGE scale using two independent studies. Study 1 mainly adopted exploratory factor analysis to test whether the twenty items of the CGGE construct and the eight items of consumer equilibrium can represent these constructs statistically via exploratory factor analysis. Furthermore, through Study 2, this study primarily tested the convergent and discriminant validity of CGGE and consumer equilibrium. Finally, further analysis explains the relationship between CGGE and consumer equilibrium through green purchase intentions at different levels of brand credibility, including high and low levels, using structural equational modeling. Study 1 showed that the initial twenty items of CGGE are appropriately loaded on four factors and the eight items of consumer equilibrium are appropriately loaded on single factors. Study 2 demonstrated that CGGE could significantly predict consumer equilibrium through green purchase intentions at different brand credibility levels. This article contributes to the advancement of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and research and provides a valuable tool for future empirical research on ChatGPT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most consumer-facing empirical studies still examine assistive conversational systems and intention-based delegation rather than fully delegated execution.
“most consumer-facing empirical studies still examine assistive conversational systems and intention-based delegation rather than fully delegated execution”
From From Recommendations to Delegation: A Systematic Review Mapping Agentic AI in E-Commerce and Its Consumer Effects (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 148 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Sadiq, M. W., Akhtar, M. W., Huo, C., & Zulfiqar, S.
- Affiliations
- Liaoning University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huo, Chunhui
- Venue
- The Service Industries Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-12-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 173-217
- ISSN
- 0264-2069 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9507
- OpenAlex
- W4389392735
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Service Industries Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Social Science Foundation of China (21BGL047)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, chatbots, sustainable consumption, green purchase intention, consumer equilibrium, brand credibility, e-commerce, UTAUT, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review