Cited by 81

FACIAL EXPRESSION RECOGNITION BY PEOPLE WITH MÖBIUS SYNDROME

Calder, Andrew J., Keane, Jill, Cole, Jonathan, Campbell, Ruth, Young, Andrew W.·2000·Cognitive Neuropsychology

Abstract

We present an investigation of facial expression recognition by three people (BC, LP, and NC) with Mobius syndrome, a congenital disorder producing facial paralysis. The participants were asked to identify the emotion displayed in 10 examples of facial expressions associated with each of 6 basic emotions from the Ekman and Friesen (1976) series. None of the three people with Mobius syndrome was significantly impaired on this task. On a second test of facial expression recognition using computer-morphed facial expressions, NC showed a statistically significant impairment, BC a borderline deficit, and LP was unimpaired. However, even when impairments were found, people with Mobius syndrome still recognised many of the facial expressions shown to them. The recognition of facial expressions by people who have never been able to produce such signals on their own faces demonstrates that the ability to produce facial expressions is not a necessary prerequisite of their recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/026432900380490

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not all patients with impairments in action production are also impaired in action recognition, suggesting that motor ability may not always predict this aspect of 'action understanding'.

    “not all patients with impairments in action production are also impaired in action recognition, suggesting that motor ability may not always predict this aspect of 'action understanding'”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Calder, Keane, Cole, Campbell, & Young, 2000

Cited by

Authors
Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Cole, J., Campbell, R., & Young, A. W.
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
2000-02
Volume
17
Issue
1-3
Pages
73-87
ISSN
  • 0264-3294
  • 1464-0627
Cited by
81
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review