A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition
Abstract
Although peaks and troughs in cognitive performance characterize our daily functioning, time-of-day fluctuations remain marginally considered in the domain of cognitive psychology and neuropsychology. Here, we attempt to summarize studies looking at the effects of sleep pressure, circadian variations, and chronotype on cognitive functioning in healthy subjects. The picture that emerges from this assessment is that beyond physiological variables, time-of-day modulations affect performance on a wide range of cognitive tasks measuring attentional capacities, executive functioning, and memory. These performance fluctuations are also contingent upon the chronotype, which reflects interindividual differences in circadian preference, and particularly upon the synchronicity between the individuals' peak periods of circadian arousal and the time of the day at which testing occurs. In themselves, these conclusions should direct both the clinician's and the researcher's attention towards the utmost importance to account for time-of-day parameters when assessing cognitive performance in patients and healthy volunteers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 3-back task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task.
“This task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task [46,47].”
From Dawn simulation light impacts on different cognitive domains under sleep restriction (2015) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 163 · Cited by 778
- Authors
- Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Liège (BE)
- Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel (CH)
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Peigneux, Philippe
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 755-789
- ISSN
- 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0627
- OpenAlex
- W2058260126
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- circadian rhythm, time of day effects, cognitive performance, chronotype, sleep pressure, attention, executive function, memory, individual differences, circadian preference
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Arousal, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Humans, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep, Thinking, Wakefulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review