Cited by 778Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition

Schmidt, Christina, Collette, Fabienne, Cajochen, Christian, Peigneux, Philippe·2007·Cognitive Neuropsychology

Abstract

Although peaks and troughs in cognitive performance characterize our daily functioning, time-of-day fluctuations remain marginally considered in the domain of cognitive psychology and neuropsychology. Here, we attempt to summarize studies looking at the effects of sleep pressure, circadian variations, and chronotype on cognitive functioning in healthy subjects. The picture that emerges from this assessment is that beyond physiological variables, time-of-day modulations affect performance on a wide range of cognitive tasks measuring attentional capacities, executive functioning, and memory. These performance fluctuations are also contingent upon the chronotype, which reflects interindividual differences in circadian preference, and particularly upon the synchronicity between the individuals' peak periods of circadian arousal and the time of the day at which testing occurs. In themselves, these conclusions should direct both the clinician's and the researcher's attention towards the utmost importance to account for time-of-day parameters when assessing cognitive performance in patients and healthy volunteers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02643290701754158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 3-back task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task.

    “This task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task [46,47].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 163 · Cited by 778

Authors
Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel (CH)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Peigneux, Philippe
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
2007-10
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
755-789
ISSN
  • 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0627
OpenAlex
W2058260126
Cited by
778
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
circadian rhythm, time of day effects, cognitive performance, chronotype, sleep pressure, attention, executive function, memory, individual differences, circadian preference
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Arousal, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Humans, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep, Thinking, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review