Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110Writing and Handwriting EducationReading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental dysgraphia: An overview and framework for research

Open access
McCloskey, Michael, Rapp, Brenda·2017·Cognitive Neuropsychology
DOI 10.1080/02643294.2017.1369016PMC PMC6238209
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Developmental deficits in the acquisition of writing skills (developmental dysgraphias) are common and have significant consequences, yet these deficits have received relatively little attention from researchers. We offer a framework for studying developmental dysgraphias (including both spelling and handwriting deficits), arguing that research should be grounded in theories describing normal cognitive writing mechanisms and the acquisition of these mechanisms. We survey the current state of knowledge concerning developmental dysgraphia, discussing potential proximal and distal causes. One conclusion emerging from this discussion is that developmental writing deficits are diverse in their manifestations and causes. We suggest an agenda for research on developmental dysgraphia, and suggest that pursuing this agenda may contribute not only to a better understanding of developmental writing impairment, but also to a better understanding of normal writing mechanisms and their acquisition. Finally, we provide a brief introduction to the subsequent articles in this special issue on developmental dysgraphia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02643294.2017.1369016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 107

  1. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00466 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00146965-200403000-00003 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.015 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1525740108325553 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1359154 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jnnp.49.4.369 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/brain/104.1.21 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/02687030344000067 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/1511269 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/713755740 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/02643290442000077 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/14640748508400944 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0093-934X(84)90032-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90061-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/02643298808253271 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90014-X · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90003-E · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0407 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11145-008-9153-7 · DOI
  23. Coltheart, M., & Funnell, E. (1987). Reading and writing: One lexicon or two? In D. A. Allport, D. G. Mackay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading, and writing (pp. 313–339). London: Academic Press.
  24. 10.1080/19404158.2015.1114000 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/14640748308402483 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/02687040042000313 · DOI
  27. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00169 · DOI
  28. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02045 · DOI
  29. Ehri, L. C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read words. In M. Wolraich & D. Routh (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 121–195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  30. Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 113–146). London: Academic Press.
  31. 10.1080/01690968808402084 · DOI
  32. Frith, U. (1978). From print to meaning and from print to sound, or how to read without knowing how to spell. Visible Language, 12, 43–54.
  33. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.
  34. 10.1080/14640748908402377 · DOI
  35. Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in “GNYS AT WRK”. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.
  36. 10.1080/01690968608404678 · DOI
  37. Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1986b). Phonologically plausible errors: Implications for a model of the phoneme-grapheme conversion mechanism in the spelling process. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 300–325). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. · DOI
  38. 10.1080/02643299108253369 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/02687038.2013.869308 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00038-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/02724989243000046 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1375904 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0093-934X(91)90119-L · DOI
  46. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1992). The reading process and its disorders. In D. I. Margolin (Ed.), Cognitive Neuropsychology in Clinical Practice (pp. 229–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. 10.1007/BF00336740 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/10888430903001225 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/02643290242000871 · DOI
  50. 10.1037/a0017042 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.02.003 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1389706 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.014 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/01690960400018378 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/87565649709540693 · DOI
  56. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00567 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s11145-011-9348-1 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/14640748408402172 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1386168 · DOI
  60. 10.1044/0161-1461.3003.243 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00347.x · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90078-M · DOI
  63. 10.1080/02643299408251979 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/02643298808253276 · DOI
  65. McCloskey, M. (2001). The future of cognitive neuropsychology. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 593–610). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  66. 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.06.002 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/026432997381619 · DOI
  68. 10.1080/02643290500202730 · DOI
  69. 10.1006/brln.2001.2598 · DOI
  70. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1367654 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.07.003 · DOI
  73. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00818 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90112-5 · DOI
  75. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1376630 · DOI
  76. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00239 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1130 · DOI
  78. 10.1162/jocn_a_00109 · DOI
  79. 10.1080/0264329014300060 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/brain/awv348 · DOI
  81. 10.1080/713755804 · DOI
  82. 10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.009 · DOI
  84. Seymour, P. H. K, & Evans, H. M. (1993). The visual (orthographic) processor and developmental dyslexia. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 347–376). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  85. Seymour, P. H. K. (1986). Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. London,England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  86. 10.1093/brain/104.3.413 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00033-1 · DOI
  88. 10.1006/jecp.1997.2400 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90046-1 · DOI
  90. 10.1080/02643298608253362 · DOI
  91. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1368468 · DOI
  92. 10.1007/s11881-003-0013-5 · DOI
  93. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00862 · DOI
  94. Tainturier, M.-J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  95. 10.1017/S0142716400006329 · DOI
  96. 10.1080/14640748608401586 · DOI
  97. 10.1007/BF00257972 · DOI
  98. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01883.x · DOI
  99. 10.1097/00011363-200020030-00004 · DOI
  100. 10.1093/oso/9780195062199.001.0001 · DOI
  101. Treiman, R. (2003). Phonology and spelling. In T. Nunes, & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 31–42). Dordrecht: Kluver.
  102. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1337630 · DOI
  103. 10.1023/A:1025501406971 · DOI
  104. 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G · DOI
  105. 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90010-O · DOI
  106. 10.1023/A:1007903330463 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.08.073 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
McCloskey, Michael
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-05-19
Volume
34
Issue
3-4
Pages
65-82
ISSN
  • 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0627
DOI
10.1080/02643294.2017.1369016
PMC
PMC6238209
OpenAlex
W2754433981
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Johns Hopkins Science of Learning Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (DC006740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
developmental dysgraphia, writing acquisition, spelling deficits, writing impairment, research agenda
MeSH terms
Adult, Agraphia, Cognition, Handwriting, Humans, Reading, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.