The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exposure of populations to dioxins and related compounds
Abstract
The present situation with respect to the exposure of the general human population to PCDDs, PCDFs and (dioxin-like) PCBs and specific issues that should be taken into consideration for a risk assessment of these exposures have been summarized. The information is based on studies performed in The Netherlands and Germany in the last 10 years. Additional data have been collected through a literature search and through many contacts with researchers and national authorities. The most important route for human exposure to PCDDs, PCDFs and (dioxin-like) PCBs is food consumption contributing over 90% of total exposure, with products of animal origin and fish making the greatest contribution to this exposure. The dietary intake of PCDDs and PCDFs by the general population of industrialized countries is on average 1-3 picograms of (i)-TEQ per kilogram body weight per day. If the contribution of dioxin-like PCBs are also considered, the daily TEQ intake can be a factor of two to three higher. Special consumption habits and consumption of highly contaminated foodstuffs may lead to lower and higher TEQ intakes. In general, TEQ intake increases during childhood and stabilizes in adults of about 20 years of age. However, when normalized by body weight exposure is found to decrease with childhood age due to increasing body weight. Exposure has been shown to have fallen over time in all countries where data are available. Countries that started to implement measures to reduce dioxin emissions in the late 1980s, such as The Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany, clearly show decreasing PCDD/PCDF and PCB levels in food and consequently a significantly lower dietary intake of these compounds by almost a factor of 2 within the past 7 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van den Berg, M., Birnbaum, L. S., Denison, M., De Vito, M., Farland, W., Feeley, M., Fiedler, H., Hakansson, H., Hanberg, A., Haws, L., et al. (2006) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl055 · Cited by 3,785
Fish Intake, Contaminants, and Human Health: Evaluating the Risks and the Benefits
Mozaffarian, D., & Rimm, E. B. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.15.1885 · Cited by 1,966
Haug, L. S., Huber, S., Becher, G., & Thomsen, C. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.011 · Cited by 391
Market basket study on dietary intake of PCDD/Fs, PCBs, and PBDEs in Finland
Kiviranta, H., Ovaskainen, M.-L., & Vartiainen, T. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.002 · Cited by 351
Porta, M., Puigdomènech, E., Ballester, F., Selva, J., Ribas-Fitó, N., Llop, S., & López, T. (2008) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.10.004 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Djien Liem, A. K., Furst, P., & Rappe, C.
- Venue
- Food Additives and Contaminants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 241-259
- ISSN
- 0265-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035706540
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure of populations to dioxins and related compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/026520300283324
- The paper
- Djien Liem, A. K., Furst, P., & Rappe, C. (2000). Exposure of populations to dioxins and related compounds. Food Additives and Contaminants. https://doi.org/10.1080/026520300283324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.