Cited by 34Heavy Metals in PlantsAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of aluminium concentrations in samples of chocolate and beverages by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Sepe, A., Costantini, S., Ciaralli, L., Ciprotti, M., Giordano, R.·2001·Food Additives and Contaminants

Abstract

Samples of chocolate, cocoa, tea infusions, soft drinks and fruit juice have been examined by, electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETA-AAS) for the presence of aluminium (Al). Fruit juices and chocolate were analysed after an adequate sample preparation; the other products were evaluated directly. Sampling was performed in duplicate for 248 independent samples. The mean Al concentration in chocolate was 9.2 +/- 7.5 mg kg(-1), and individual values were correlated with the per cent of cocoa in samples (Y = 0.63 + 0.27X, r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Al concentration in commercial tea infusions ranged from 0.9 to 3.3 mg l(-1) (mean = 1.80 +/- 65 mg l(-1), whereas in laboratory-prepared samples it was 2.7 +/- 0.93 mg l(-1). In soft drinks, the concentrations of Al were lower, ranging from 9.1 to 179 microg l(-1); the highest values were observed in samples of orange squash (mean = 114 +/- 56 microg l(-1)). Apricot juice showed the highest Al level (mean = 602 +/- 190 microg l(-1)), being statistically, different from that of pear (mean = 259 +/- 102 microg l(-1)), but not different from that of peach juice (mean = 486 +/- 269 microg kg(-1)). Toxicologically, the amount of Al deriving from the consumption of these products is far below the acceptable daily intake of 1 mg kg(-1) body weight indicated by the FAO/WHO, and it is a verv low percentage of the normal Al dietary intake.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02652030118615

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aluminium is present in foods naturally or from the use of aluminium-containing food additives.

    “Al is present in foods naturally or from the use of Al-containing food additives (Sepe et al., 2001; Flaten, 2002; Hayacibara et al., 2004; Yokel et al., 2008).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Sepe et al., 2001

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alfrey A. C., 1986, Kidney International, 29, S8
  2. Alfrey A. C., 1989, Aluminium and Health, 101
  3. Baxter M. J., 1990, Food Additives and Contaminants, 7, 101, 10.1080/02652039009373826 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF01734067 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0026-265X(84)90022-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000181985 · DOI
  7. EEC, 1980, Direttiva del Consiglio del 15 luglio 1980 concernente la qualità delle acque destinate al consumo umano n. 80/778/EEC
  8. 1994, Summary Evaluations Performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)
  9. 10.1007/BF01734064 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0278-6915(88)90095-6 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/3430204 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90053-R · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0048-9697(83)80024-2 · DOI
  14. Lote C. J., 1991, Clinical Science, 81, 289, 10.1042/cs0810289 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF01734065 · DOI
  16. Martin C. N., 1989, Lancet, 59, 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91425-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.897661 · DOI
  18. Schlatter C., 1992, La Medicina del Lavoro, 470
  19. Severus H., 1988, Aluminium in Food and the Environment, 88
  20. 10.1016/S0024-3205(83)80002-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0007114599001762 · DOI
  22. Varo P., 1980, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 127
  23. 10.1007/BF01734060 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ki.1990.324 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sepe, A., Costantini, S., Ciaralli, L., Ciprotti, M., & Giordano, R.
Affiliations
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Venue
Food Additives and Contaminants
Published
2001-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
788-796
ISSN
0265-203X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016928340
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
aluminum, chocolate, Theobroma cacao, tea infusion, soft drinks, fruit juice, apricot juice, dietary aluminium intake, acceptable daily intake, food contamination
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Beverages, Cacao, Carbonated Beverages, Citrus, Food Contamination, Humans, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Tea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review