Cited by 14Homelessness and Social IssuesHealthcare innovation and challengesCollaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives

Understanding the principle of consumer choice in delivering housing first

Open access
Oudshoorn, Abe, Smith-Carrier, Tracy, Hall, Jodi, Forchuk, Cheryl, Befus, Deanna, Caxaj, Susana, Ndayisenga, Jean Pierre, Parsons, Colleen·2023·Housing Studies

Abstract

Based on an analysis of a Housing First program this study explores the principle of ‘consumer choice’. Housing First is a model aimed at rapidly ending experiences of housing loss. Based on interviews with 4 program staff and 7 Housing First recipients, this analysis brought to light complexities in ‘consumer choice’ . The provision of consumer choice can be constrained when housing markets are tight, or when consumers seek congregate living when scattered-site is the focus. Choice can also be a challenge if consumers request housing readiness prior to re-housing. While the principle of choice has allowed services to move away from a staircase model, also considered as a “one size fits all” approach, we need to critically assess whether our current system supports self-determination around unique needs and preferences. This paper provides a thorough discussion on the challenges associated with enacting the principles of Housing First, and how policy environments can either impede or support consumer choice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02673037.2021.1912713

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oudshoorn, A., Smith-Carrier, T., Hall, J., Forchuk, C., Befus, D., Caxaj, S., Ndayisenga, J. P., & Parsons, C.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • King’s University College (CA)
  • Fanshawe College (CA)
  • Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University
Corresponding author
Oudshoorn, Abe
Venue
Housing Studies
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
841-859
ISSN
  • 0267-3037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-1810
OpenAlex
W3159116532
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Housing Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Keywords
Housing First, consumer choice, housing loss, homelessness, congregate housing, self-determination, staircase model, housing policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review