Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation Pedagogy and PracticesGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deconstructing the Carter Review: competing conceptions of quality in England’s ‘school-led’ system of initial teacher education

Mutton, Trevor, Burn, Katharine, Menter, Ian·2017·Journal of Education Policy
DOI 10.1080/02680939.2016.1214751
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The commitment to establish a ‘school-led’ system of teacher education in England, announced by the Coalition Government in 2011 and relentlessly pursued thereafter, represented a radical departure from previous kinds of initial teacher education partnership. While it is entirely consistent with a neoliberal agenda, with its strong regulatory framework and appeal to market mechanisms, it is also underpinned by a particular conception of teaching as a craft – ‘best learnt as an apprentice observing a master craftsman or woman’. In 2014, the government established a Review of Initial Teacher Training, led by a primary school head teacher, Sir Andrew Carter. This signalled the recognition of teacher education as a ‘policy problem’, adopting Cochran-Smith’s term. The ensuing report, published in early 2015, was more nuanced than might have been anticipated, although a number of profound tensions emerge from a closer analytical reading; four of these tensions are similar to those previously defined by Cochran-Smith and two are newly emergent. This paper identifies and discusses these tensions as they appear in the Carter Review and relates them to wider debates about the links between teaching, teacher education, evidence and research and to policy-making processes in education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02680939.2016.1214751

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Alter J., 2009, Teaching as a Clinical Practice Profession: Implications for Teacher Preparation and State Policy
  2. AACTE (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education), 2010, The Clinical Preparation of Teachers: A Policy Brief
  3. Benton P., 1990, The Oxford Internship Scheme: Integration and Partnership in Initial Teacher Education
  4. Bowe R., 1992, Reforming Education and Changing Schools
  5. Bransford J., 2005, Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, 1
  6. Burn K., 2015, Beginning Teachers’ Learning: Making Experience Count
  7. Burn K., 2013, Review of Research-Informed Clinical Practice in Teacher Education, Paper Submitted to the BERA-RSA Inquiry
  8. Carter A., 2015, Carter Review of Initial Teacher Training (ITT)
  9. 10.5944/reec.22.2013 · DOI
  10. 10.3102/0013189X034007003 · DOI
  11. Cochran-Smith M., 2005, Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
  12. 10.1080/02607476.2013.836339 · DOI
  13. Craft M., 1984, Change in Teacher Education. Context and Provision since Robins, 332
  14. 10.1177/0022487105283796 · DOI
  15. Darling-Hammond L., 2012, Teacher Education around the World - Changing Policies and Practices, 130
  16. Darling-Hammond L., 2012, Teacher Education around the World – Changing Policies and Practices
  17. Darling-Hammond L., 2012, Teacher Education around the World - Changing Policies and Practices, 151
  18. DfE (Department for Education and Science), 1984, Initial Teacher Training: Approval of Courses (Circular 3/84)
  19. DfE (Department for Education), 2010, The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010
  20. Donaldson G., 2011, Teaching Scotland’s Future: Report of a Review of Teacher Education in Scotland
  21. 10.1080/02607470903462230 · DOI
  22. Ellis V., 2014, Learning Teaching from Experience, 10.5040/9781472593313 · DOI
  23. Furlong J., 2013, Education – An Anatomy of the Discipline: Rescuing the University Project?, 10.4324/9780203078853 · DOI
  24. Furlong J., 2000, Teacher Education in Transition: Reforming Professionalism?
  25. Furlong J., 2013, Policy and Politics in Teacher Education: International Perspectives, 10.4324/9781315876245 · DOI
  26. Gove M., 2013, Mail Online, 23
  27. Hagger H., 2006, Learning Teaching from Teachers: Realizing the Potential of School-Based Teacher Education
  28. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x · DOI
  29. Hillgate Group, 1986, Whose Schools? A Radical Manifesto
  30. House of Commons Education Committee. Great Britain. Parliament, 2012, Great Teachers: Attracting, Training and Retaining the Best Volume I (HC 2012 1515-1)
  31. Kennedy A., 2016, Teacher Education in times of Change
  32. 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n6.9 · DOI
  33. Lawlor S., 1990, Teachers Mistaught: Training in Theories or Education in Subjects?
  34. 10.1007/978-94-6091-711-0 · DOI
  35. Mayer D., 2015, Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education – Final Report
  36. McIntyre D., 1990, The Oxford Internship Scheme: Integration and Partnership in Initial Teacher Education, 17
  37. Murray J., 2016, Teacher Education in Times of Change, 57
  38. Mutton T., 2016, Teacher Education in times of Change, 201
  39. 10.1787/9789264018044-en · DOI
  40. 10.1080/0305006032000162020 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/02680930116819 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Sahlberg P., 2014, Aspiring to Excellence. Final Report of the International Review Panel on the Structure of Initial Teacher Education in Northern Ireland
  43. Sahlberg P., 2012, Report of the International Review Panel on the Structure of Initial Teacher Education Provision in Ireland: Review Conducted on Behalf of the Department of Education and Skills
  44. 10.3102/0013189X015002004 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Tabberer R., 2013, A Review of Initial Teacher Training in Wales
  46. 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.003 · DOI
  47. Zeichner K., 2013, Beitrage Zur Lehrerbildung [Swiss Journal of Teacher Education], 30, 153

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mutton, T., Burn, K., & Menter, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Mutton, Trevor
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Education Policy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-08-08
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
14-33
ISSN
  • 0268-0939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5106
DOI
10.1080/02680939.2016.1214751
OpenAlex
W2518832669
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Education Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
initial teacher education, teacher education quality, policy tensions, teaching as a craft, neoliberalism in education, education policy-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.